From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marco van Hulten Subject: bug#30655: closed (Re: bug#30655: xset(1) not accepting symlink to font path) Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2018 16:26:14 +0100 Message-ID: <20180303162614.2fe6c3c5@jasniac.instanton> References: <87lgfahci2.fsf@gnu.org> <20180228225429.09cd9fd8@jasniac.instanton> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35691) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1es93x-00060F-PW for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2018 10:27:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1es93u-0005c0-Lo for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2018 10:27:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:35054) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1es93u-0005bY-Hn for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2018 10:27:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1es93u-0000DH-54 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2018 10:27:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-reply-to: List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 30655@debbugs.gnu.org Ludo'=E2=80=94 Je 2 mrt 12:46 skribis GNU: > > diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi > > index 24db16761..35221ff94 100644 > > --- a/doc/guix.texi > > +++ b/doc/guix.texi > > @@ -1572,7 +1572,7 @@ To be able to use such full names for the > > TrueType fonts installed in your Guix profile, you need to extend the > > font path of the X server:=20 > > @example > > -xset +fp ~/.guix-profile/share/fonts/truetype > > +xset +fp $(dirname $(readlink -f ~/.guix-profile/share/fonts/truetype/= fonts.dir)) > > @end example =20 >=20 > Actually commit 07ec349229 that I just pushed fixes this very line. So > I guess we=E2=80=99re done? I don't think so, because I just did a 'git pull', and found that the old patch had been applied (the one with `readlink... that doesn't work, instead of the above with $(dirname $(readlink...) which works. Apropos, how often are the HTML pages generated from the repository and put online? =E2=80=94Marco