From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#30540: ssh: No user exists for uid 1000 Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 07:52:19 -0500 Message-ID: <20180220125219.GB7573@jasmine.lan> References: <20180219230645.GA5650@jurong> <20180220003044.GA6440@jasmine.lan> <20180220100817.GA2345@jurong> <20180220115430.GB17373@jasmine.lan> <20180220120810.GB14718@jurong> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IrhDeMKUP4DT/M7F" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59668) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eo7Pu-0006NI-Vf for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 07:53:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eo7Pq-0002BN-1M for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 07:53:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44345) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eo7Pp-0002BE-T4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 07:53:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eo7Pp-000643-MI for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 07:53:01 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180220120810.GB14718@jurong> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Andreas Enge Cc: 30540-done@debbugs.gnu.org --IrhDeMKUP4DT/M7F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 01:08:10PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 06:54:30AM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > > I do wonder if we should configure glibc with --enable-obsolete-nsl, > > which apparentely restores the old behavior, at least until deprecation > > turns into removal. I guess it depends on how many complaints there are, > > and how soon we can rebuild glibc. >=20 > Maybe an item in the release notes would be enough? In general I am in > favour of going forward and not enabling obsolete features. I'm in favor of this choice, too. --IrhDeMKUP4DT/M7F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlqMGgMACgkQJkb6MLrK fwhKlg//eZX4AbWKebxhouAzTU9Kzlp4noJAgZGPLRESkI338e6WhxRIASiEyLF0 6ilItRxJVoqbwlSxejV4r8nI9XPa+mCD/c97wkQMMcUt4n7HfPRtTncAh+LFdG2B CmpOzA4ie8g8gOzmQbpxS+XwPF105rOaFZXnfheLrhyCgYa9Fm/RzYPnHFyWfQEv nEZyHC0aDzi/sBAMZKy4Q49EkQyDVPzxfOo2fMLIT5LMn5EJ1BBoWcQSlvcEbLUV pq0aZ2rF4zn9WtM8fGVpOyLxqWuzlDCOS7+xt7qCJBso+nBcZZSgVFt4HSwECQM1 axI/eXIuScjx4PspDgGQtHEjvZPqmfKl4/YMKSRcvmm6v7F208YKezLu2z6fo801 6DL+uaEIMiOk2el/9JbzjtWJKO56GvrZAoVOKFrmJ+BWaRvNwhMWtr+0FVQUpfuF lvK9wSaN188dnZ3wPB3RZAv9lFpSAZps/CyU9iZUAuMfc5qHmccG5XGSQ7YLUXim w0Jaat/iY9X3rV7vYhJKNs9AuStH2Fgj1Q0eIREVoq230HN15CqRzZ3EMqVejXr5 GH96SSzDsJH1gFOBH7f85yNnT4zzRYqin7edQrYpnfsVFdxh0uxvVk8ks3EC7Swf oGqLw8fijwy49fhubJ9Aqf5vhLFD8Yang80KjwRRkkDXD/Nf/cQ= =ed5P -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IrhDeMKUP4DT/M7F--