From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#23364: python-statsmodels build failures Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 20:07:01 -0500 Message-ID: <20180211010701.GA28859@jasmine.lan> References: <878u02d7f3.fsf@netris.org> <20180209213356.GA11389@jurong> <87mv0gmrco.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34456) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ekg7f-0008Oi-7v for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 20:08:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ekg7e-00006V-8t for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 20:08:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57778) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ekg7e-00006C-4Q for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 20:08:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ekg7d-0002uI-SR for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 20:08:01 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87mv0gmrco.fsf@netris.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Mark H Weaver Cc: 23364@debbugs.gnu.org --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 05:07:03PM -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote: > reopen 23364 > thanks >=20 > Andreas Enge writes: >=20 > > This has probably been fixed in the following commit: > > > > commit 25b2c47d753efd0761a4e16519dce38d828789f5 > > Author: Hartmut Goebel > > Date: Sun Oct 16 18:40:58 2016 +0200 > > > > gnu: python-statsmodels: Fix build > > > > * gnu/packages/statistics.scm (python-statsmodels): [check] set > > PYTHONPATH prior to running tests. > > > > In any case the package did compile in 2017, and was updated later to 0= =2E8.0. >=20 > No, there have been over 200 nondeterministic build failures of > python-statsmodels since that commit, including over 140 failures of > 0.8.0. I usually have to ask Hydra to attempt to rebuild it several > times before it finally succeeds. I wonder if the test suite is really worth running in this case? Maybe we should just report the failures upstream and skip the tests. --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlp/lzUACgkQJkb6MLrK fwie6A//TBanNFEqMUCVtKSULEAVYs3nYPeF+QWh4Es7Xc+63um72E973jnU4EFf BR053B/3yxJ/tpODuj623BveUL7+39UUYOx9oD2bzJYHwgE+ysHxHyr5gwPSxno8 84uuxIx6F336ImNEr3Pp70PHzmA7kCn+Xy9c1QX31sd0UHOAI3HHJS8r1GbflU6M 2YLjkVCwJLKHfsr58bl8XWsVoSaHKwcBd2ECUqjWqMEnguqv2bJP7tYRtNDZsb8j N5In6HTePcqaVUyUQcjbJdLRIJ+GVp6GIPVc0Q5lTwCLAJYATrTGClnROq+dwWaV tyiBgWBzNOMDFv9/tnvQiDNSODYTbNsOWHQiz1/sCj9u6aSeGJC3TsOAyrbS+0g3 MLVrdAnYk3miRFk5gBxuJasFJsOvM9w44NA34mFJoe/cPyQsbtR5NHBcrZ8DmuVp M+QVrm5yJBXpLoN5BFVGYTv2CZY+Das4tXACjd65K08SNLQioPkPZAg8AeypLiPr JHz6cc6ZZZc5JBQgIoM/cfViZswDQptI1Y+ZHuU5wpKePJGIOd72May2woJxuXJC f1mXEYTskYaIFB9+z9VuIKdhAxPdpb5kvsMKKYpcO9gCHT6L4UG6/AsBPL3g8oXG SZj+bTBjbTdPy6VVnDQBKzJbAA9eVvhvhiOVdfeUKv4DDWeFWiw= =kK4C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l--