On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 09:54:49AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Heya, > > Leo Famulari skribis: > > > On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 04:40:30PM -0200, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote: > >> 2017-12-04T10:07:40+0100 Ludovic Courtès wrote: > >> > Hello, > >> > > >> > The problem is that the (gnutls) module is not in the search path of > >> > ‘guix substitute’. > >> > > >> > Usually the solution is to start the daemon using something like: > >> > > >> > sudo -E ./pre-inst-env guix-daemon … > >> > > >> > so that ‘guix-daemon’ inherits the correct values for ‘GUILE_LOAD_PATH’, > >> > etc. > >> > > >> > Does that work for you? > >> > > >> > We used to have this suggestion in the doc, but it was reverted in > >> > commit 73a203450d21241eca50375aeb26fb418b287414. Leo, do you think we > >> > can reinstate it? I’m not sure why it was reverted in the first place. > > > > I missed this request previously :/ > > > > Originally, I reverted the suggestion because it was causing problems > > for some users on #guix, and I thought it was risky to propagate the > > user's environment into a privileged context. > > > > But perhaps it's not any more risky than using sudo, in general. > > > > Ludo, please let me know if you'd still like me to reinstate the advice > > to use `sudo -E`. > > I think you can reinstate it, perhaps with a word of caution explaining > what -E does? Done in 67441b9a6ebd4be094a88f6ea4555de026de4dfc. I didn't add a warning about -E... I worry about re-documenting other software in our own manual.