From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#29674: Ceph creates Btrfs subvolumes on Btrfs during tests. Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 18:07:40 -0500 Message-ID: <20171227230740.GB2331@jasmine.lan> References: <87bmj4qfan.fsf@gnu.org> <370b49eecdaf24eaf076fc9ef7479b61@mykolab.com> <871sk0q6go.fsf@gnu.org> <7be83282-3edf-38a1-f29a-87f8bed33715@tobias.gr> <87bmj3its4.fsf@gnu.org> <20171227235039.4c0006fa@mykolab.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="i0/AhcQY5QxfSsSZ" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39008) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eUKnu-0006oH-6I for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 18:08:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eUKnr-00057b-0A for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 18:08:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45597) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eUKnq-00057I-Qb for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 18:08:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eUKnq-0004mS-Ei for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 18:08:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171227235039.4c0006fa@mykolab.com> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Rutger Helling Cc: 29674@debbugs.gnu.org --i0/AhcQY5QxfSsSZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 11:50:39PM +0100, Rutger Helling wrote: > This bug has been open for quite a while now. > If there are no objections in the next few days, I'd like to disable the > tests entirely for now with a FIXME on finding and disabling only the > offending tests. That sounds fine for now. >=20 > On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 21:19:07 +0100 > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote: >=20 > > Tobias Geerinckx-Rice skribis: > >=20 > > > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote on 12/12/17 at 17:03: =20 > > >> So does guix-daemon systematically leave /tmp/guix-build-ceph* > > >> behind it? =20 > > > > > > Almost certainly. I can confirm several hundred previously unknown > > > subvolumes filling up my btrfs substitute server. Time to clean > > > up. =20 > >=20 > > Ouch. I find this Btrfs behavior highly questionable. > >=20 > > Let=E2=80=99s make sure our packages don=E2=80=99t leak Btrfs subvolume= s then! > >=20 > > Ludo=E2=80=99. >=20 --i0/AhcQY5QxfSsSZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlpEJ7wACgkQJkb6MLrK fwhlZg//W2BFnpxHxT/r9YDFfwRO9uexWa25ZcTdQiidpyae+YCD1EevQn3Gep1B /yRVlugR0gDVxzIPanCnbwLizyk1Cf9Dq9OC71fe9jaK7SDdDOWsfSRyC1rq0Dsa 07KtlL4KndITNmTeFKaY31YGlzQ4Umw1pgEWA4WkSQMgxV6HyTYKcazkCjggw7tX PYVW5mIyFryObuecyvHN1Fj3EZPCnIZLOC0YFDuDzRPwppVmcdto8Ga8rQXyo2XG N8m1zGNzc9jiJhZuHg6xoKqEvuZaeDuPt5Y/AqMf4uHmtMmv+60KyE7HphL7NpyG 8zvi0Xblu9F0RSxHxcpiFGCU3Sznw/UtxiMeXVK6bCUfs2EmTLDOYohBhpQn07sZ pDU62EdJ28YUKLh+nLgEhC0vpFWIMxxM9/9yHrTCmtM6FICcft9GtsPUKft2FX8F KImbHalIJB+vnPXvaH+nJ6gmG5lSXD2Rw+kv27dXhSthqvtoA07jK37hmMqO3Npw XBa6YTwNNDg/3RRrOqph3WWgxtCN+fMCu37Gkb2iDyH6kEJxkVl19amOBLoo0g+M Cc4G8DR2N7gq8Qcdmfgyj0m/fe+m4qQC3th7/uBuf06mj3mdFZQ2qYEIb19DQeGn PQ73uwTIFVxLoChRV7wM6OZts8f6ATkwZVEi8Uea6EJRXwsWH3Y= =oYKq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --i0/AhcQY5QxfSsSZ--