From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: bug#29196: upstreaming of reproducibility related patches Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 05:12:43 +0000 Message-ID: <20171108051243.2y52u2bo46oze6r3@abyayala> References: <20171107171720.3qk5hhbbxsy3nclg@abyayala> <878tfim06i.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kpo2annfxhhnknqv" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56605) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCIgg-0003KD-6B for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 00:14:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCIgb-00059I-TB for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 00:14:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48751) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCIgb-00059B-Og for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 00:14:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eCIgb-0007o2-K4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 00:14:01 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <878tfim06i.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Cc: 29196@debbugs.gnu.org --kpo2annfxhhnknqv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jan Nieuwenhuizen transcribed 1.0K bytes: > ng0 writes: >=20 > > as I wrote in #29135, we should upstream the patches we > > gather for reproducibility. Share with upstream what is > > applicable to more software than just Guix included > > definitions of the software etc. >=20 > > We have no list for this so far > > We need to share this, to avoid duplicate work elsewhere. >=20 > What about the reproducible builds list? Well, list as in a list that lists our patches, not a mailinglist ;) > https://lists.reproducible-builds.org/listinfo/rb-general > General discussions about reproducible builds >=20 > At the reproducible-builds summit last week in Berlin some work has been > done on the topic of upstreaming patches. I think some effort has gone > (is going?) into a email template that starts by explaining what > reproducible-builds is, why it is important and why upstream should > consider taking the patch. >=20 > Greetings, > janneke >=20 > --=20 > Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org > Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar=C2=AE http://AvatarAcademy.c= om >=20 --=20 GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 GnuPG: https://dist.ng0.infotropique.org/dist/keys/ WWW: https://ng0.infotropique.org --kpo2annfxhhnknqv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEqIyK3RKYKNfqwC5S4i+bv+40hYgFAloCkksACgkQ4i+bv+40 hYgt/w//fZtieQRSF/f3Vh3fwx0crU/Z4lj3a3/Rqiq5Dyv8dpIR7CwAOyKIEdQF HHAOgoTlkeKpq7+YE7eNU0lQMq6qPM5svJopNlFK1ug0AdYQrt1LrVbVjg83cCQn ndsuIlOKdhbwA6IsJh7Gh3hd3BdrAtmDI9cV75aMoNr/YSSnF+HuQ9fnOP+3I0+f uEaMjXsxztZ+ovf8YxtV92Vech+JfznFwqLR9047PAj3RWerIU/DqkZ2nibhFHkK Vc5hLL+CgCNdnu+7y36rbMgq/466AzR5qnKk5EI9i0lLIKSRKMOPZrqWUG/usmWU MFoYFTC94vUG6fnzdM4INS6rRuQXdSWFrdcFRHYai+bjLoaSypVdWGLXgXGdg1cY SYz78WwqyaOtP/6Cc8PRzS8SC3jg0xbh6wpViSAoJFLcH0GXqmsaCMQ2Z/Jkm1iR CyWLbDHKHIw1NiSUS9X88T4yQ0+zHtnhy4JyPSMA0QaIOGM27hfvOIRERM3NYZPz CRRrVTxw1xojmKpehfBURtpX1gQ2aAp94zzCWjq5Jjz5Irytn/N8LigOTCg3CaSj t6WCMz2HoJc9xTbkGWN9JN8dHWqsQoepIUvI2iC52nhzHtV68044Mynt7fMzkY9L o90gDQKEgZoOK/MRiMYhJ56yi9WiQAZOBjYqDOcJukTqM0RW7Ds= =vUqu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kpo2annfxhhnknqv--