Jan Nieuwenhuizen transcribed 1.0K bytes:
> ng0 writes:
> 
> > as I wrote in #29135, we should upstream the patches we
> > gather for reproducibility. Share with upstream what is
> > applicable to more software than just Guix included
> > definitions of the software etc.
> 
> > We have no list for this so far
> > We need to share this, to avoid duplicate work elsewhere.
> 
> What about the reproducible builds list?

Well, list as in a list that lists our patches, not a mailinglist ;)

>     https://lists.reproducible-builds.org/listinfo/rb-general
>     General discussions about reproducible builds <rb-general@lists.reproducible-builds.org>
> 
> At the reproducible-builds summit last week in Berlin some work has been
> done on the topic of upstreaming patches.  I think some effort has gone
> (is going?) into a email template that starts by explaining what
> reproducible-builds is, why it is important and why upstream should
> consider taking the patch.
> 
> Greetings,
> janneke
> 
> -- 
> Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
> Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com
> 

-- 
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
GnuPG: https://dist.ng0.infotropique.org/dist/keys/
  WWW: https://ng0.infotropique.org