From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: bug#28310: guix build -n misses package builds Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 14:42:55 +0200 Message-ID: <20170907124255.GA1405@jurong> References: <20170831190334.GA6673@jurong> <87a82exbj7.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42580) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dpwAB-0001Os-94 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Sep 2017 08:44:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dpwA6-0001pL-7O for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Sep 2017 08:44:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45248) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dpwA6-0001ov-4c for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Sep 2017 08:44:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dpwA5-0004rI-RW for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Sep 2017 08:44:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87a82exbj7.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 28310-done@debbugs.gnu.org On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 01:08:12AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > “-n” now implies “--no-grafts” (commit > fd59105c49965db956fac73c68d8b00d068f5d5c). This was motivated by the > need to have -n really perform a dry run. > > The downside is that with -n we now see only half of the build plan, and > when we remove -n, we start with the other half of the build plan, > grafting. > > The “build continuation” idea of ‘wip-gexp-grafts’, discussed in > , could in theory help with that. Okay, so to simplify, I am closing this bug report. Andreas