From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Subject: bug#28310: guix build -n misses package builds
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2017 12:04:00 +0200
Message-ID: <20170902100400.GA1917@jurong>
References: <20170831190334.GA6673@jurong>
 <87a82exbj7.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36286)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1do5Ia-0005oB-AH
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 06:05:12 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1do5IU-0003iB-KK
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 06:05:08 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:32776)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1do5IU-0003i6-Fj
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 06:05:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1do5IU-0005NB-85
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 06:05:02 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.28310.B28310.150434665120583@debbugs.gnu.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87a82exbj7.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: 28310@debbugs.gnu.org

Hello,

On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 01:08:12AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> “-n” now implies “--no-grafts” (commit
> fd59105c49965db956fac73c68d8b00d068f5d5c).  This was motivated by the
> need to have -n really perform a dry run.

if I understand your answer correctly, then no output with "-n" means that
the ungrafted packages are already available in my store.

> The downside is that with -n we now see only half of the build plan, and
> when we remove -n, we start with the other half of the build plan,
> grafting.

Then this other half would just be grafting, which would not require to
download source and build packages locally.

Or are the built packages the replacements for packages with security
updates, that are grafted upon the existing packages?

Andreas