From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#27556: libpng has wrong hash. [Fwd: Re: why has the hash for libpng-apng 1.6.28 changed?] Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 10:34:20 -0400 Message-ID: <20170731143420.GA10829@jasmine.lan> References: <20170702201344.dvqpopouvpbzr4c2@abyayala> <20170723101547.3oi5uu2xhi625njp@abyayala> <20170725184936.GA32001@jasmine.lan> <20170726065651.qvsz25b44txl6et7@abyayala> <20170726084040.GE12553@macbook42.flashner.co.il> <20170730093722.xqhesfpmbpmussag@abyayala> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34838) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dcBmm-0008Mz-76 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 10:35:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dcBmg-0006tk-Ij for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 10:35:08 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:32798) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dcBmg-0006sr-BA for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 10:35:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dcBmf-0003YM-TT for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 10:35:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170730093722.xqhesfpmbpmussag@abyayala> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Efraim Flashner , 27556@debbugs.gnu.org, ng0 --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 09:37:22AM +0000, ng0 wrote: > Efraim Flashner transcribed 4.1K bytes: > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 06:56:51AM +0000, ng0 wrote: > > > My really strong guess is that we never updated the hash for > > > libpng-apng when the libpng was updated fron which libpng-apng > > > inherits its version. [...] > > git blame shows that back in February I updated libpng to 1.6.28 from > > 1.6.25, but that the last time libpng-apng was touched was by ng0 back > > in January. > >=20 > > commit: 864738baaa7bb75c08647ccfc684736479e67f7f Aha, that must be it! > Okay, so I will send the update for libpng-apng (which due to its > inheritance of libpng is just the hash) and I will also add a second > commit which adds a comment above libpng that we must update libpng-apng > when we update libpng, if that's already possible (libpng-apng might not > immediately be up to date, but we don't update libpng immediately aswell > due to it being a core-updates candidate). I think we should give libpng-apng its own version because, as you said, libpng-apng may not be developed at the same pace as libpng. This way, we won't end up with a broken libpng-apng again. --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAll/P+gACgkQJkb6MLrK fwh9RRAAkLmtfbip2r2N911bkZM4PQgcsbUF6eMrXAPBDgQ9Ia8pVjSp/bxqfvFk zR0y7aF1CeMCdjtdyin/h/8we5Ip9XJ2XiJV66pJGBrt3aMpFVjXLiRbZrnvj4ME 5lZICM+QefuiPyOQsb6BX14Xm9gu8nKvx8RpuXgJPDpMlUZ44kG6qAsXO2tHd8wO s/4RL7Tm3wWSS7g9YNQsENrQxsevfbi86+yG+jJR4I6qWEj5m14J/Hp2A32ZWJBI EQO4SktmIhhjezo9uhN4dnbrOTkW0eYJuPV4KX98H8hgl7nkRC7DovbmuoGv8tox E3jRpuZAE/JxFJv24vJi/Yh/CoQWaSgRliGVYLUbecffhaw2clmRGOd5k0z+fSww 7J46Juyt5LWgWrl7RzRQZeIBfrPeWPe92e9AGKNmcE42W+EHqY89H1+xy29SnlL7 CwnxMyqq1a6G4QcIZG2L384Jmhru0ydEK+rEY9Ziy6vWXxflV9nBauiSLn0A4sMp 7nUE3cxNznIb2/wPpdVbnTES6TnWw6xD4tS3ldmnVufEQZJzlr1XXR0PDFxxr0ph ndAnqrnELogcSrgE6nGEQPhiZSL7H5nhR1YPg6qjNOKYoaK9/AyMPKIKdQWtggys tG4swrtU8+Wys7Z/X2qydO2RNQEfXhbuDAp6Z4DkNi7QeGLMxAc= =8PYs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH--