From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#27759: NTP pool vendor zone Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2017 20:28:18 -0400 Message-ID: <20170731002818.GA2410@jasmine.lan> References: <20170718214256.GA20175@jasmine.lan> <87bmogma8b.fsf@gnu.org> <20170720185914.GA18030@jasmine.lan> <20170730024322.GA32565@jasmine.lan> <87wp6qf6dx.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41841) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dbya2-0000LZ-9j for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jul 2017 20:29:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dbyZy-0003tI-Bb for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jul 2017 20:29:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60192) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dbyZy-0003t7-6r for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jul 2017 20:29:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dbyZy-0005Lo-0w for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jul 2017 20:29:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87wp6qf6dx.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 27759-done@debbugs.gnu.org --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 02:36:58PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > > I think we should document that I am the administrative contact for the > > "zone". Any suggestions for where to document that? >=20 > At least as a comment in the definition of =E2=80=98%ntp-servers=E2=80=99? >=20 > Maybe we should also have a file in guix-maintenance.git listing > specific responsibilities like this, membership to linux-distros or > similar lists, privileged contact with upstream for specific packages, > etc. WDYT? Yes, perhaps, although I'm worried it will fall out of sync and become more frustrating than useful. For now I added a comment above %ntp-servers. > > From e8fd9d703dba134dab7f008951e68d11d3d2ca21 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Leo Famulari > > Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2017 20:43:40 -0400 > > Subject: [PATCH] services: ntp: Use the NTP pool via the 'guix' zone. > > > > * gnu/services/networking.scm (%ntp-servers): Use *.guix.pool.ntp.org. >=20 > Yes! :-) Pushed as 57f57a7bbfe1dbb2092ea082f575706fed03a42f! --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAll+eaIACgkQJkb6MLrK fwiSaA/9FC3gCJZAySeht+m4kJgkFeVDrXSV6wDI7PM12lAK4F/765msyY6l9BDF G/vipeeWBo7VDhgeROqo+6dIn6shIHtRi5znZ6EIOKY6UarXFYGB0xZBpns4M6d9 qtXYBVzBaBMg+ITRIYJqtWurs/TgyGm6hZhk7dd0Xu6DPJL8HqumjXNt50YBQw7n ICZxQmP9QHVfmSfNVqxD85bko3QoE7Hd3kopErjZr9r/UrNpKLpxhFJ7bNGryf+K L17pVNocca51nrDpo3EEyT9tfWxI4aLZqIARV+JjCji//oEeJ30HDZdg2endr3IX HLE7dj9yQCVUwPP88sE+sDHPBgIekUXl2UnCm1VS66wRSLO7FEwLCbckZr4W2z1q Bq08HuxF9j73ahZLE/4X6bdfis4ne2a9bHVQzW8WC1Mh5XBdODA2k5ZnKvsZLppA kBtoMBdHihvC/95g8oCSkCeJn3p3fYYrfYmttSzqddICQ6vfXlQObrH9v9cL94Fy j1zHXgiFj6xThchqGen6UhGCr2on4M5tIIIsI/g0pEYiF35FlBw+h4/Dg7n5UHiO oiGmUjMhRN8kJzp6wVd9MpsoreauvPRk3m5vS9t4BiMLzMo8t9NqBLVnmdcEReoy xQLtME+z5HdZ/0gUiyFyp3ISCDuPKdVmP5njpVGYqIQp7bKsIAI= =pEED -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO--