On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 02:59:14PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:40:20PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > Leo Famulari skribis: > > > They recommend we apply for a vendor zone instead [2]. We would not have > > > to run our own NTP servers. > > > > > > Does anyone know if GNU or the FSF have a vendor zone we could use? > > > Otherwise, we should apply for one and adjust our ntp-service. > > > > Apparently 1.gnu.pool.ntp.org does not exist, so I suppose we can apply > > for one. > > > > I’ll email the GNU maintainer list to let them know and double-check. > > Based on that discussion, I've applied for guix.pool.ntp.org. The DNS for {0,1,2,3}.guix.pool.ntp.org is live, and the attached patch is working for me. I think we should document that I am the administrative contact for the "zone". Any suggestions for where to document that?