From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Subject: bug#27811: net-tools patch has no effect?
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 14:03:35 -0400
Message-ID: <20170725180335.GA8448@jasmine.lan>
References: <20170725041225.GA31642@jasmine.lan>
	<20170725045947.GA531@jasmine.lan> <87shhkncq3.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20170725175202.GA27528@jasmine.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1"
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58705)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1da4Bi-0005W0-NA
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 14:04:07 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1da4Bf-0005La-J8
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 14:04:06 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53542)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1da4Bf-0005KG-FT
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 14:04:03 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1da4Be-0004T4-3O
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 14:04:03 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.27811.B27811.150100581817143@debbugs.gnu.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170725175202.GA27528@jasmine.lan>
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: 27811@debbugs.gnu.org


--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 01:52:02PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> Is this the right way to create the test-only package variant for now?

I was reminded of the hidden-package procedure. I'll try rewriting this
change using it.

--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAll3h/cACgkQJkb6MLrK
fwj/bhAAuHZqem84xLIG6j0x4kCwO3lJ8BrGhwxk6JVtMZ4NFOMPEVVcKmqxmXcE
t5G1R+yn0pUABpRlv9MzWps6WcuRMMLXy6nZHVnoKqjZJ+hhTfPSKx/QAPLIsIQg
A7OReb6v0QzwDD4jLyr296V/ZqM46jCIN/bbS9AOKIFefNWx4vGAprmgJsQK2xhu
eJrTILPr3EMTWJUvRieK1tLQjdsH1gbZzgoX+8dCnpJMr5p5pjcFeZs4uQ1eNKfs
Zxk9mvVJuzVj2hjGxyDSD1Xs1VRAuHR6QZQ73r55MdTEK+9c0kJ81hqxWu3pDytD
h203YQPdGHzbCmFY9go9jCo9LTiJ7U9UOUqxXerc5qbnYyFtMGJUDG/5WGNdaFeb
Vo1CaUu9RseDqHT8QB1ujDl8WIqY5kw8mZiupUTj2/WWGMcZY+P8A611p6C1pWFG
afR+/SxPQv5VrL7S/F+WunBrrEtzmlYIwYjbTuL3NpjrmfAFQzaOLfLx0qsHpTIE
mgYKGRAQauhhXWwR5lDv/88/Kmu1rMXKm0Mgm8KF83WXFalOUdWchJ19HqND487g
J210Q9fFB7p6OK+nnM41ipaLf2k/Wwgk8HMPR6oqvhKv4GcAfbUvqP81rjUdpqPf
0O2IusxWGyX2JGLw7YxL53psTDemnRh1REDZ4aBnO6k+WD/FVW8=
=cYNV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1--