From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#27811: net-tools patch has no effect? Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 12:10:19 -0400 Message-ID: <20170725161019.GA1443@jasmine.lan> References: <20170725041225.GA31642@jasmine.lan> <20170725045947.GA531@jasmine.lan> <87shhkncq3.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35223) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1da2QN-0000h4-VK for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 12:11:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1da2QI-00025i-QM for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 12:11:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53471) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1da2QI-00025a-N2 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 12:11:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1da2QI-0001s9-J9 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 12:11:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87shhkncq3.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 27811@debbugs.gnu.org --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:27:00AM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > > This patch will try to apply the patch and handle the exit codes of > > gunzip and patch correctly: >=20 > Good catch, this LGTM. I wonder how this went unnoticed for so long! By handling the exit codes properly, the build fails ;) But I'm working on that today. > As for the actual update, the intent is to add a second =E2=80=98net-tool= s=E2=80=99 > variant, right? Right. I want to be able to update net-tools without rebuilding everything. So, GnuTLS will use a special variant of net-tools for its test suite, and the built GnuTLS will not keep any references to net-tools after it is built. --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAll3bWsACgkQJkb6MLrK fwhQwhAAo+zNCy8g/g27bAgjoWvqEKIttX99oPncOZi9UvXQCcIJwvF2qRM2dJBf JgGO+0oVe3DJ175OJgXyotllQfilR1W27ehtJB+a70VQ+6cZ+ZbtZ5Ja1JnYTLUf XsSvnU4wYk+zcrle6f+nLEpnO4fDgbhNkPy6LSnosY6aOdQm4ROhEc8nTkjAx282 7Era/3JLV79M6bPr0XXtlkEHhsA/46Hm20dFIfuFKKGNiewyWPZltefZZ/NTzMks l2lhIsF4jkyvnEiulR2JVdf4HQWW860lT+W/+Rp6Nx3hCdsfZXaY+D9s10TXHuU7 zW8MOo8yvCf//XKGOE8C8ZbRvVypu8pIALVrUXFs9g2xU+u9ff/Vdwj7C4dBmplV Leb2ozfbS1NSL2oeHpYkpfIEuYzcOJNTd8oTA7aWmj2DCOyPLnhExykvR+ybYoHF /eO1DYoaWnjdcJkpks7YdbKY3eWfoswXORjbXaQVGeTKJxhc/7gYJYg170yotckj uJ+/KnKG0xJ5+ggkJxOAUPsFFZsTzx+SDZUe+M8BoJyKCiBKaRWH0PFymgol05Yb Pxi/jSM13k5u+Vg/mCvUfHd2gp7I3zB1PolVmkt66aFK7VDFI9QfJKhklUXTiZCY IZ4JnPJ0HxOavySY7MIFbigL48sSj+AVhHiYS+MOBmoXf9eVcCU= =canH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N--