From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#27636: /dev/kvm went missing on i686, Linux 4.12 Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 11:52:45 -0400 Message-ID: <20170710155245.GA20351@jasmine.lan> References: <87y3rwetng.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34285) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUazj-0002O6-Ca for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 11:53:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUazg-0006CL-8w for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 11:53:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:58362) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUazg-0006BP-04 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 11:53:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dUaze-0003NQ-4s for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 11:53:03 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87y3rwetng.fsf@elephly.net> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: 27636@debbugs.gnu.org --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 07:40:51AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Since the update to Linux 4.12 my i686 machine no longer has /dev/kvm. > I ran =E2=80=9Cmodprobe kvm=E2=80=9D successfully, and =E2=80=9Clsmod=E2= =80=9D shows =E2=80=9Ckvm=E2=80=9D, but the > device node does not exist. >=20 > Running =E2=80=9Cmodprobe kvm-intel=E2=80=9D prints: >=20 > modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'kvm_intel': Input/output error I see the same thing on x86_64, but also with older kernels (at least the 4.11 series). --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlljosoACgkQJkb6MLrK fwiU8RAAjC1Aq1J8BlVXEs9yFrNdA80KPjqEtF1Yxuhy9YVG7/uCMSPyBZUaUbN0 JhkoG34BdWvQ9eUb/JwIdw3Spx5EPoGyJv7HF1lf3tCOVmrhdlyFVVOTXMtGjRmd caoauc57PTbDLCtF/cHpxUUBFso5OXynaI5h7nfmzS2r2K3kGbd1oLsUTos7hW+1 WPDYRg4sTtT8O8St3Q5URp3QfuZTf3id4mr/kwfzCAOFOiOeSM6j/F0DFLxv/BgQ LU2oe1MGrlg2x5L4ftINj5jlQQ4wJIulU0pqYKPOeCpF7ekl+5K8bXWO0H6ZwlHN wR12vylIJB63Xk3OnH+qbIjhHdv6nYN8+BVIrKX37dvoQrFQXkuTt/gPD55TVROp Nv1qzJWGOcL3h7IqtV3fp5hn6f62Ao3mPKNZU+oKK0khTFySyeIQoIvzKRMBWsIi IBOVRyAlQgvWuoXPZixV+ywerj0zdBKhY1/+LJT+1KBH+62vaHLipEKEp3kSWzEM uGse70aJWhW806blUkFWj0WmyuJrKWZEHNvXNO6W9QF3K+zbMyOaDkVBJkBGpWjz Sn71SMjQbOE1MHgyxWgBT5Xs/ThMp+dlbAnMCJclwgcHtUjgS+O0zE2Fc3Ye+TY9 Gi9q1JlDSHvipVyoNO17wt+xHKPoqF6WkulNp4i+dL3P44XW8sw= =29n0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+--