From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#27605: Lightweight desktop example fails to build with kernel panic Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 12:32:30 -0400 Message-ID: <20170707163230.GB17441@jasmine.lan> References: <20170707034946.GA20028@jasmine.lan> <87o9sw8mhi.fsf@gnu.org> <20170707125337.GA11418@jasmine.lan> <20170707132151.GA16788@jasmine.lan> <877ezk6zvd.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60220) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dTWBl-00023P-60 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2017 12:33:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dTWBi-0007QR-4U for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2017 12:33:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54305) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dTWBi-0007QE-1X for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2017 12:33:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dTWBh-0006R1-Oz for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2017 12:33:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <877ezk6zvd.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 27605-done@debbugs.gnu.org On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 05:16:54PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > Actually, false alarm! After increasing the image size to 20 GiB, I > > missed the messages about being out of space. Sorry for the noise! > > So the problem is that the estimate was too small, right? No, the problem was that I forgot about the estimator and tried to use 10 GiB, which was too small :) > It would be awesome if you could fiddle with the heuristics in there to > see what would work. :-) I just tried the estimator and it worked fine.