From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#27282: Perl 5.26.0 "dotless @INC" [was Re: bug#27227: [PATCH] gnu: perl: Update to 5.26.0.] Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 22:48:02 -0400 Message-ID: <20170612024802.GA22884@jasmine> References: <87k24ryigh.fsf@fastmail.com> <20170604163721.GC14880@jasmine> <87inkbppmb.fsf@fastmail.com> <20170604191939.GB2840@jasmine> <20170607223730.GA4844@jasmine> <87vao6wtmh.fsf@gnu.org> <20170608152916.GA24963@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58725) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dKFPe-0003MB-5o for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 22:49:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dKFPa-0001Es-96 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 22:49:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:39000) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dKFPa-0001Em-5e for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 22:49:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dKFPZ-0004e2-W1 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jun 2017 22:49:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170608152916.GA24963@jasmine> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 27282@debbugs.gnu.org --tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 11:29:16AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 02:28:54PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > > Leo Famulari skribis: > > > We should set this PERL_USE_UNSAFE_INC variable in the SWIG package > > > definition, right? Probably we will need to set it in several other > > > packages as well. > >=20 > > We can do that, but probably there will be (or there is already) a patch > > for SWIG to not rely on having =E2=80=9C.=E2=80=9D in @INC, no? >=20 > I hoped so, but I couldn't find any discussion on the SWIG bug tracker > or mailing list, nor a commit in their source repo. >=20 > I guess I should bring it up on their bug tracker :) I filed a bug report: https://github.com/swig/swig/issues/997 In the meantime, setting PERL_USE_UNSAFE_INC will give us what we had before, which is a SWIG that looks for modules in the current working directory. Building core-updates locally, I found several other Perl modules that have the same issue. --tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlk+AN8ACgkQJkb6MLrK fwg5UhAA7KcBPW4bW1uRMOlJbzYu6cno9xuyPThcbShlTspe3yLMNdPHAwAcKgB0 tbVx8la2UM+SeBzhcoNk033N6Zr68N/O8sJrfUy9G4JVTk00Qta8yxqWAdW9N9ce wvWePI0Bp09BbkKJnvKc4QJbfNc3fzHTXdPeowtrKjPgGThmE3PDa/o91uef2qsy td2I9N/nuzOCSMWBiZynYeLY1s7gA6TRJwbBvIYEqzoKURoCG+XozRE+24BRAFFl aH4uZfq+bD/R/PUZ66ZxsU7XRgt5HV3c1cExK1iLmq6mOGgcp9qn0o24yeztxske 29wl2QTx4i1tGuUTP8zog9z3wtNzSrIDrhE7dPtNJX/xwA5IcDhsdEr6pIqI0LHh DcGvcVo/wSsQsdurVo5nZCDZv/wezaVJuQhGnKMmWMb3gLtIfRmsWPdG/E/+1QJC bx/+N+wZCkrSsBH4N8j83sZdmPNdd/kOmzxQge1hqokksbd7cGxlqZNtuOtl9pdV xqOwr9Opo0vp1XSPCpwnYSBEYYo1P6IzBKJdQcJbTF5lUBe8cj4BHqVkakGx9BDu iD1X56ZyJdtjTKSL3+S8qkqk0gGPzT1dyn9zWqR54+kOH2Y57gVbV7XtGf2Zi0Ag ncEkmPlQd4WLV6ZkKtvdcYOBS2hi6t8be6skjVdAeyW4yj2n+vQ= =KSGB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB--