From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#27282: Perl 5.26.0 "dotless @INC" [was Re: bug#27227: [PATCH] gnu: perl: Update to 5.26.0.] Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 11:29:16 -0400 Message-ID: <20170608152916.GA24963@jasmine> References: <87k24ryigh.fsf@fastmail.com> <20170604163721.GC14880@jasmine> <87inkbppmb.fsf@fastmail.com> <20170604191939.GB2840@jasmine> <20170607223730.GA4844@jasmine> <87vao6wtmh.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52874) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dIzNx-0006tp-05 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 11:30:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dIzNs-00013N-SC for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 11:30:09 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60830) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dIzNs-00013E-Nv for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 11:30:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dIzNs-00011J-FW for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 11:30:04 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87vao6wtmh.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 27282@debbugs.gnu.org --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 02:28:54PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Leo Famulari skribis: > > We should set this PERL_USE_UNSAFE_INC variable in the SWIG package > > definition, right? Probably we will need to set it in several other > > packages as well. >=20 > We can do that, but probably there will be (or there is already) a patch > for SWIG to not rely on having =E2=80=9C.=E2=80=9D in @INC, no? I hoped so, but I couldn't find any discussion on the SWIG bug tracker or mailing list, nor a commit in their source repo. I guess I should bring it up on their bug tracker :) --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlk5bUgACgkQJkb6MLrK fwix7A/8DylumAbZSYp0mK9qa/4cfBdyc9pb5ta0zK3b0H7OZNdZVgxM7VzBUSPX fIhwbtpzXrEVb4K5Jdj5uaNKT3UptygGhhMq/A/TDh07i10DKSpOxBYRMBUebkAs G8+mLImD3jJlSCADfmZaQgi34yMIdLOtfznevpXsiXD2HoDGX5Jz2ZXEKLzuBQRk F1wYqSj+PaJabHuAtfRHMFQFQZI182Z4MB/RCbKaipQQ6BFLfzkgWrouryYN8VYe Oc9T1qox18DehVd6vyvPtlIo+HDRmQ6H46xyRR5NmPqx1/4tfQdjyBxqv0eNX9Mw tL8CGp4F8/sX3QD1TMn1bTq7aFBO8DrQ37xIxSWgYm/l+bCJpU/p1tD/UNB0iVMO FkttElhCKKr87PmwJEpxAof3Ehi/9sP9gpwTNtfqTQPX+2AHrs2Kzmv7rpycd/y6 p70mEqmHzeHetk2K9KZy5jjm5J7KJxUuOWmmdXnXUymM0H0rayfLyUb4KsyLumUM 2K2aBykAmRlfCaXoBbk+sw9wImUp1g5jCovxRv/vn9u+S5xqii9VUQtEoWHKOKJS oBB3waS8FMtm2Jv+hchP+UuXF314EyKJV0oOGPTpMwVbUp7WPyxGSMjcNgbalJZ8 BJ3aJIlfDbFpga99DvZ5ixbf7pdjy6m8iseUvmPRatD1upOA4KA= =i+d8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb--