From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Quiliro Subject: bug#27034: mount -L will mount the first partition with the named label Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 13:28:12 -0500 Message-ID: <20170524132812.230d71a5@riseup.net> References: <20170522204919.3fba3de2@riseup.net> <20170523043554.GA12886@jasmine> <20170523023853.1fd98a69@riseup.net> <8737bvc3pa.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59633) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDb0v-00027w-L2 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 24 May 2017 14:28:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDb0s-0002jn-Am for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 24 May 2017 14:28:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:33898) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDb0s-0002ja-6J for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 24 May 2017 14:28:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dDb0r-0004g7-TK for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 24 May 2017 14:28:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <8737bvc3pa.fsf@elephly.net> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: 27034@debbugs.gnu.org El Tue, 23 May 2017 11:39:13 +0200 Ricardo Wurmus escribi=C3=B3: >=20 > Quiliro writes: >=20 > > Now that installation had failed, I decided to remove all contents of /= mnt/tmp to start from 0.=20 > > > > lsblk recognized: > > sda as the usb installer > > sdb1 as a previous failed installation with label my-root > > sdc1 as the current installation with label my-root > > > > When I restarted to begin installation from fresh, I noticed that /mnt/= etc/bare-bones.scm was changed from sda to sdc. I remember having changed i= t. But I started doubting. Then I checked the mount and noticed that /mnt w= as in sdb1 instead of in sdc1. So I umounted and mounted with -L again. But= it would mount sdb1 again. So I umounted and mounted with /dev/sdc1 and no= -L. That worked. >=20 > I don=E2=80=99t understand this bug report. Labels must be unique. They= are > a more readable alternative to using UUIDs. Yes. I just inserted the two disks and the old one had the same configurati= on as the old. I copied the contents of the one to the other to avoid downl= oading again the packages. --=20 Example of the problems in top posting: A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? A: No. Q: Should I leave quotations after my reply? Saluton, Quiliro 0987631031