On Sat, May 06, 2017 at 04:42:59PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > > > Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > > > >> Qemu comes with support for sharing files with a guest via Samba. This > >> is done by appending something like this to the qemu-system-* > >> invocation: > >> > >> … -net user,smb=$HOME/Downloads -net nic > >> > >> Qemu needs to be told *at configure time* where the smbd executable will > >> be at runtime. By default this is /usr/sbin/smbd. Users can work > >> around this problem by installing the “samba” package and creating a > >> link from /usr/sbin/smbd to the actual executable. > >> > >> It would be better to fix this, but this would require adding samba as a > >> dependency to Qemu, so that the location can be set at configure time. > >> Alternatively, we could patch Qemu to look for smbd depending on an > >> environment variable. > > > > See commit b344c505f4dff2ecbe981f0a0a3c3d67b222dcca, which removed the > > dependency and Samba. Prior to that commit, QEMU recorded the absolute > > file name of ‘smbd’. > > > > The problem is that Samba is big: > > > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > > $ guix size qemu |tail -1 > > total: 710.5 MiB > > $ guix size qemu samba |tail -1 > > total: 1203.5 MiB > > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > > > Thus it’d be best if we modified QEMU to search for ‘smbd’ in $PATH. > > Tangentially, would it make sense to add a "qemu-full" package? I'd like > to add RBD support when Ceph is stable on Hydra, but that adds another > ~300MiB to the closure (and a very expensive dependency..). If qemu-full is something that would be generically useful, sure. Otherwise, maybe you could bring it to the potluck!