* bug#26749: stagit: do not patch example.sh shebang @ 2017-05-02 16:15 ng0 2017-05-02 17:21 ` Leo Famulari 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: ng0 @ 2017-05-02 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 26749 Hi, I just noticed that stagit's example.sh has a patched shebang. While I would assume that everyone notices when this fails, it would probably be good to not make too optimistic assumptions and keep #!/bin/sh in the file. -- https://pragmatique.xyz PGP: https://people.pragmatique.xyz/ng0/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* bug#26749: stagit: do not patch example.sh shebang 2017-05-02 16:15 bug#26749: stagit: do not patch example.sh shebang ng0 @ 2017-05-02 17:21 ` Leo Famulari 2017-05-02 17:32 ` ng0 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Leo Famulari @ 2017-05-02 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ng0; +Cc: 26749 [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 582 bytes --] On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 04:15:52PM +0000, ng0 wrote: > Hi, > I just noticed that stagit's example.sh has a patched shebang. > While I would assume that everyone notices when this fails, > it would probably be good to not make too optimistic assumptions > and keep #!/bin/sh in the file. I think that we need a generic way to mask files from the shebang patcher. There are several packages that includes files whose shebangs are inappropriately patched. We should merge these bugs: <https://bugs.gnu.org/25304> <https://bugs.gnu.org/25508> <https://bugs.gnu.org/26749> (this bug) [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* bug#26749: stagit: do not patch example.sh shebang 2017-05-02 17:21 ` Leo Famulari @ 2017-05-02 17:32 ` ng0 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: ng0 @ 2017-05-02 17:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Leo Famulari; +Cc: 26749, ng0 Leo Famulari transcribed 1.6K bytes: > On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 04:15:52PM +0000, ng0 wrote: > > Hi, > > I just noticed that stagit's example.sh has a patched shebang. > > While I would assume that everyone notices when this fails, > > it would probably be good to not make too optimistic assumptions > > and keep #!/bin/sh in the file. > > I think that we need a generic way to mask files from the shebang > patcher. There are several packages that includes files whose shebangs > are inappropriately patched. > > We should merge these bugs: > > <https://bugs.gnu.org/25304> > <https://bugs.gnu.org/25508> > <https://bugs.gnu.org/26749> (this bug) I fully agree with this. -- https://pragmatique.xyz PGP: https://people.pragmatique.xyz/ng0/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-05-02 17:33 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2017-05-02 16:15 bug#26749: stagit: do not patch example.sh shebang ng0 2017-05-02 17:21 ` Leo Famulari 2017-05-02 17:32 ` ng0
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).