* bug#26749: stagit: do not patch example.sh shebang
@ 2017-05-02 16:15 ng0
2017-05-02 17:21 ` Leo Famulari
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: ng0 @ 2017-05-02 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 26749
Hi,
I just noticed that stagit's example.sh has a patched shebang.
While I would assume that everyone notices when this fails,
it would probably be good to not make too optimistic assumptions
and keep #!/bin/sh in the file.
--
https://pragmatique.xyz
PGP: https://people.pragmatique.xyz/ng0/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* bug#26749: stagit: do not patch example.sh shebang
2017-05-02 16:15 bug#26749: stagit: do not patch example.sh shebang ng0
@ 2017-05-02 17:21 ` Leo Famulari
2017-05-02 17:32 ` ng0
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Leo Famulari @ 2017-05-02 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ng0; +Cc: 26749
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 582 bytes --]
On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 04:15:52PM +0000, ng0 wrote:
> Hi,
> I just noticed that stagit's example.sh has a patched shebang.
> While I would assume that everyone notices when this fails,
> it would probably be good to not make too optimistic assumptions
> and keep #!/bin/sh in the file.
I think that we need a generic way to mask files from the shebang
patcher. There are several packages that includes files whose shebangs
are inappropriately patched.
We should merge these bugs:
<https://bugs.gnu.org/25304>
<https://bugs.gnu.org/25508>
<https://bugs.gnu.org/26749> (this bug)
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* bug#26749: stagit: do not patch example.sh shebang
2017-05-02 17:21 ` Leo Famulari
@ 2017-05-02 17:32 ` ng0
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: ng0 @ 2017-05-02 17:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Leo Famulari; +Cc: 26749, ng0
Leo Famulari transcribed 1.6K bytes:
> On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 04:15:52PM +0000, ng0 wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I just noticed that stagit's example.sh has a patched shebang.
> > While I would assume that everyone notices when this fails,
> > it would probably be good to not make too optimistic assumptions
> > and keep #!/bin/sh in the file.
>
> I think that we need a generic way to mask files from the shebang
> patcher. There are several packages that includes files whose shebangs
> are inappropriately patched.
>
> We should merge these bugs:
>
> <https://bugs.gnu.org/25304>
> <https://bugs.gnu.org/25508>
> <https://bugs.gnu.org/26749> (this bug)
I fully agree with this.
--
https://pragmatique.xyz
PGP: https://people.pragmatique.xyz/ng0/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-05-02 17:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-05-02 16:15 bug#26749: stagit: do not patch example.sh shebang ng0
2017-05-02 17:21 ` Leo Famulari
2017-05-02 17:32 ` ng0
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).