From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#26671: serf package (guix dependency) tests fail Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 10:58:17 -0400 Message-ID: <20170427145817.GA32045@jasmine> References: <87bmric5x6.fsf@fastmail.com> <878tmmc4rd.fsf@fastmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48668) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d3ksu-00065y-Hy for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 10:59:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d3ksp-00032S-4b for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 10:59:08 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44788) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d3kso-00032O-DA for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 10:59:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3kso-00015i-6I for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 10:59:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <878tmmc4rd.fsf@fastmail.com> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Marius Bakke Cc: 26671@debbugs.gnu.org, Maxim Cournoyer --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 04:19:18PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote: > Apparently "patch" does not yet support binary diffs either: >=20 > patching file test/test_buckets.c > Hunk #1 succeeded at 1232 (offset -91 lines). > patching file test/server/serfcacert.pem > File test/server/serfclientcert.p12: git binary diffs are not supported. Perhaps we should avoid using binary patches in Guix, but I think you could use a patch with a binary diff by passing '--binary' to (patch-flags). I haven't tested it, however. --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlkCBwYACgkQJkb6MLrK fwjDFw//dC3ZHyR8TD3D2SJPEAbrhMTstLWQPId1QYDniVFrWoFRbEaYMkbMNr41 W+tP3F6K+nH9F5n88KnYygJSQf3J5AzrLnLlGdpFvTkf+K5F3jZnIFezRR/Zdqp3 fAO6DxHWVxZeUF6BdqmxqZBiBi14RaScwHpfY4JPPRWdV0gfHBwubqIsqZZ2YZeN w4cMwyCP99iA9lYo9I7BcVJrTx5WMZggSk8rJCGtHxALdF2ws62k8J5nCAjKswRx NyJ8OdLq4h//k9JGJCdsNHh5N6HxhIDDDm/UnNByn38DY7q4RPGwdqQfnxMeuAbW MXxXJOVsvD2Snv0Z5Qlxth0ewkWiaSKabcqhJQR82i33fjOOsCqSJZXFQbmUN5D4 7/CK/nallhDHBtjeYlXVSgjlrlTjclwykfh8/3Zh8naaJcaBhNnucGh1x7l4GPqH LoTKDaYqSCw45FjB1fkz7gMlRE3jzMAWBcUsjgE6orgsh/IqEJoD6EGaY9uIgKEi bevhunGgZRFruv5Gh8cgRwbvi689z9E1lzbPclVnOCkutjyza6UWHjkgRbcc850h ixD55a3bFTxpCwUMf1dfYuwAXPV3t1stR+JZdRBXQxnoIXGmx8N96lDWuSz4gjsn diZKan6UDQVGFZtjUrL/PpDtBe3AIZSZtDMpxnzHQMzGIVqr7xg= =l5+g -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC--