On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:19:41PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Leo Famulari skribis: > > gcc-libiberty-printf-decl.patch: Added in > > b810a85019ab3c4ee1f889d0751b8eb06157dadc and mentioned in the > > commit message but never used, AFAICT. Ludo? > > It was used for 5.3 (commit e3d0fcbf7e55e8cbe8d0a1c5a24d73f341d7243b, > which the commit above reinstated; see > ) but useless in > 5.4. So yes, can be removed! Ah, thanks for sharing the context. > Except for this one: > > > gnu/packages/patches/readline-7.0-mingw.patch: Introduced in > > ae12d586275cdd96db23fb01bf840b2055b5b979, but never used. Jan, can you > > take a look? > > … it looks like you can go ahead and remove’em all! Done as 04b906799168008c41f62402eee74bd47c1c2681. > Maybe we should add a makefile target to check for stale patches? We're discussing it here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-04/msg00439.html I'll leave this bug open while we decide what to do about readline-7.0-mingw.patch.