From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Subject: bug#26201: No notification of cache misses when downloading substitutes Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 18:44:49 -0700 Message-ID: <20170320184449.5ac06051@khaalida> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54966) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cq8s9-0004mU-TU for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 21:46:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cq8s6-0007kx-P1 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 21:46:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38834) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cq8s6-0007kJ-JQ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 21:46:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cq8s6-0000Ra-Az for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 21:46:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54450) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cq8r7-0004Iw-H1 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 21:45:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cq8r4-0006l6-GY for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 21:45:01 -0400 Received: from sender-pp-092.zoho.com ([135.84.80.237]:25412) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cq8r4-0006kI-8h for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 21:44:58 -0400 List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: 26201@debbugs.gnu.org Just ran guix pull and guix package -u, and found some of the programs download VERY slowly (<100kb/s, usually around 95). I asked on #guix and lfam mentioned it was probably a cache miss. It would be nice if there was some notification that a cache miss happened and the download will likely be slow, otherwise a user might wonder what problem there is with their connection.