From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=C4=8Cech?= Subject: bug#25852: Users not updating their installations of Guix Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 07:25:42 +0100 Message-ID: <20170308062542.hfypmvgp2o6il2xf@penguin> References: <20170223211156.GA24382@jasmine> <877f429kju.fsf@gnu.org> <20170306213434.GA25316@jasmine> <20170307063330.bhv2ugsvi3qeofu5@penguin> <20170307195118.GA30247@jasmine> <20170307205848.42w2pusavz37dgwu@penguin> <20170307222215.GA4046@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ehgm4pl7sqcxjclw" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59848) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1clV31-0000Qg-4U for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 01:26:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1clV2y-0000Sf-0e for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 01:26:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47083) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1clV2x-0000Sa-ST for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 01:26:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1clV2x-0004CN-H3 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 01:26:03 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170307222215.GA4046@jasmine> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Leo Famulari Cc: 25852@debbugs.gnu.org --ehgm4pl7sqcxjclw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 05:22:15PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: >On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 09:58:48PM +0100, Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 =C4=8Cech wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 02:51:18PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: >> > This will take effect for the next release of Guix; it addresses a >> > problem that arises when somebody installs the binary release of Guix. >> > >> > I'm not addressing downstream packages of Guix with this commit. >> >> I'm sorry, I may not understand correctly your answer. >> >> Are you saying that situation when user freshly installs Guix on >> system with systemd (and thus has empty /gnu/store)? > >The "fix" I pushed will help anyone who does a new installation of Guix >on a Systemd or Upstart-based system, after the next release of Guix. Unless I'm missing some other commit, this won't work. When I perform these steps: 1] ./configure && make && sudo make install (or package installation) 2] mkdir /gnu/store 3] attempt to start daemon will fail as there is no guix-daemon in @localstatedir@/guix/profiles/per-user/root/guix-profile/bin/guix-daemon because there is no guix-daemon in /gnu/store Without daemon running you won't be able to make one in that location. Dead end. Best regards, S_W --ehgm4pl7sqcxjclw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEDOrssfr9jDQthC2PSiPjT6AzQ20FAli/o+AACgkQSiPjT6Az Q23/bQ//VLVACUo52+ow5WUUJ7und5e/nd/1cge4T4wQtpbykn8ooVEVfxn3lT+6 awg+TUQBVAlnQR0smPgZjeGksfwA2YY8kEyRRhgYrTYIX/8zXWJm8KKClBC1CsCj nUTZo2s9YOsg43797mPQM+8l3P3GaoI3ra2AgI4i0Dm8wdSyk345YyCEJNWvqKMl ACW2RuFpdutU6YomWz91L4JO7ABBWJgIJGb9TLNvYcY/noiJhj3NeHPyJuXHY/5Z 6MCvfepqiqhFlLMnS3TvrSkOogAnwfOQ9tu737BUueRLVRLTRn+/KPgGAuhGOP8k hURR41TN/PnTml4NVQX9HgsK2pPXDTLrvX9myEoT+fWBPHgpsjKPAWkm5SxuEsoY LIZWXHPDe6VL8oxG2+kSqmnbfPU1H+YhnAyOvBpaPOQbktByUZRSyWp8DxGT3vLb BOc2dC9UXr66/5PBTEtcmQVCezYDYXA3fDJnMK1kygrbXme37e/9szdW/Y9Jb9Su 4eaW7TZKuQuCDs/fWzhOnBlcNc/QAWtqFDUZTGcYFJxRv3GJrgc0y2xnnYbShKBJ h8X0Fz1Ap+v+p0n6Vs0Fne3yb26TAPnuFLfe5fUNG9CLtREzorm4NAiNMjcZJV+E MH3kaVVLPyLRCfudEBykpIm7J3PeoB2jQEjefEfti9VQsorB0+A= =DkGv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ehgm4pl7sqcxjclw--