From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#25852: Users not updating their installations of Guix Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 17:22:15 -0500 Message-ID: <20170307222215.GA4046@jasmine> References: <20170223211156.GA24382@jasmine> <877f429kju.fsf@gnu.org> <20170306213434.GA25316@jasmine> <20170307063330.bhv2ugsvi3qeofu5@penguin> <20170307195118.GA30247@jasmine> <20170307205848.42w2pusavz37dgwu@penguin> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48163) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1clNVZ-0000PN-S2 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 17:23:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1clNVW-0007n8-K9 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 17:23:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:46939) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1clNVW-0007n4-GL for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 17:23:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1clNVW-0007Wk-Ay for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 17:23:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170307205848.42w2pusavz37dgwu@penguin> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: =?UTF-8?Q?Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=C4=8Cech?= Cc: 25852@debbugs.gnu.org --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 09:58:48PM +0100, Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 =C4=8Cech wrote: > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 02:51:18PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > > This will take effect for the next release of Guix; it addresses a > > problem that arises when somebody installs the binary release of Guix. > >=20 > > I'm not addressing downstream packages of Guix with this commit. >=20 > I'm sorry, I may not understand correctly your answer. >=20 > Are you saying that situation when user freshly installs Guix on > system with systemd (and thus has empty /gnu/store)? The "fix" I pushed will help anyone who does a new installation of Guix on a Systemd or Upstart-based system, after the next release of Guix. Specifically, it is meant to address the issue described here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-01/msg01199.html This change won't help anyone who already is affected by that issue. I view it as one small step towards making it probable that users will keep their their Guix installations up to date. --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAli/MowACgkQJkb6MLrK fwgHrxAAntRHEoOKIMVp0Iq0gI9psz4y+/rEVOFINNJFx6dvS3zzEdFB6EJXFral fHWS51qYJ1RwN1GIZdhHccjQ0rxWlpCQU8r3kHPG9Qh2vH5v1a+P0Cnd3AIQgg3v Vd+OVXg6HCxOBsXqRRSnX1d03Ei7Axb3bTzQA8UuTVZ9FedZy2Rjs8kKbkMGJVsa puBSnfiy7s1s2PSkyADDAW6gHGosjykAYq1yh9cEXYCYEN1ESJfjhssBDtU45wYS J1Y/INBbogwa6uoaJD9GGPRz1Ewa8PWp3i1upJoajgho1oP6I3YYvpxung7/2EV/ WwghuLcyjlYOFEsiPPSP9KIhDpbd8/WfkvyCMO3mkZJITbdIFJSuKJiRAcXopGXf Q9wnb84wgqjk3qh0QkQuE95Ufqf2OHpt8kd/FhefciAN/VJPE0cF7XxruOx6lhfY xy7CZITffOSspEXHA4aW8pEhIVDtEAoULq+bB//xS00znGK8+gSIDcNt3oUn1GSP oOax+JmUeers2S7GwZI6bt5eldFNQsDwAysCE2RkgtCAgQZoHu4A0VkR64C5Jt/f m17eXRWPbr6MAZ2CwPefsLGs4KsDERTKezCNC/oEv8FI6nM4BO28Xe8/cnAbTvP8 dA8/ER3+i23spBpiWopju53FIvgOKaaVEIS9iMeycm4G5C2cxHQ= =sIJf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI--