From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#25177: python-tests: python-oslosphinx fixed. Please evaluate. Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 10:36:07 -0500 Message-ID: <20170301153607.GC18139@jasmine> References: <20170221041645.GC19762@jasmine> <87h93oyod0.fsf@elephly.net> <87zihfxxi3.fsf@elephly.net> <20170221174756.GA6450@jasmine> <87wpcjxka7.fsf@elephly.net> <87lgsybdnq.fsf@elephly.net> <87wpcffcxh.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87d1e3g8jx.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20170227202036.GB1609@jasmine> <87poi21ebk.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60838) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cj6JP-0007nn-Bf for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 10:37:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cj6JK-0006gS-DD for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 10:37:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36356) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cj6JK-0006gG-5T for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 10:37:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cj6JJ-0002bu-SK for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 10:37:01 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87poi21ebk.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Marius Bakke Cc: 25177@debbugs.gnu.org --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 05:15:59PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > It seems the evaluation timed out. Can you give it another go? Done! --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAli26mcACgkQJkb6MLrK fwhN6xAAiajaSTtTg4d1YM5aJ8+iqSrF9qhGb+qGjw2Ii84FI7cBaR+J/bkHVoZU oVZRMc2RW11SPhdV8kwOR95wkcrenP2LwEPWi3MosxqCTog6DFRMt++YBUSxuint uBAoPsaloYaI9T5vAetEBzPKG4ntOtT5ocPVSEYbN1cAZLoyzkDyhdG9mNqh9QC4 /FfR8c6ROY78VPRYvmrODfQ0gXpHMQlXeUg4LTNGvuqd13VQVWdEWC4IMPYmCUne H+VBEVbIhnk6KeFaGTlUB1hoihjNVaAKHxuS85L2k+0HjrxRfLDArxt8yszzEKEF LO48xvfvaOSkFh+fUu3k5GPc2xqGZJXdjyn8bM4rNOlTK0KeFsL/r08Z0aih9oU3 zaRmTcyaP7noY/EKNavVsfmco14TsrgrruN+nEp3hC+pGqOEj1HCZyxeUwRpMzyL zADfRInFWIleSHHwuL8xYQRdYKPYjIbtlW8PhXQlZaWfudcQSHRto2IeIy9r2LII +BekQit/ndS5oob1yzaPl/d4uAdS87MZIY+3A6YnURlQw7GNoeKRFVhO0mtIMppK +RzWTE0+gQecIQkFS5QrvwQNEpbsQ6km96o7nuQEvq4nFsD480txFr82x4PGDVF7 JmNQ/y6nYPmAudQvcWs15wUBeR4QXWc6q0GYRKkc3ex13wUWUXI= =2BOl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS--