From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#25852: Users not updating their installations of Guix Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:11:56 -0500 Message-ID: <20170223211156.GA24382@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57902) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ch0hF-0005Dj-Rp for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:13:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ch0hC-00051T-Kl for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:13:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55097) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ch0hC-00051N-H2 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:13:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ch0hC-00052B-9s for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:13:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57668) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ch0gD-0004KG-F3 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:12:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ch0gA-0004of-87 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:12:01 -0500 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:35698) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ch0gA-0004ob-4I for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:11:58 -0500 Received: from localhost (c-73-188-17-148.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.188.17.148]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7DCCE7E0D1 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:11:57 -0500 (EST) Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: 25852@debbugs.gnu.org --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In my opinion, the recent bug #25775 (Can't install packages after guix pull) [0] exposed a sort of meta-bug: there are a significant number of users who were still using the guix-daemon from 0.10.0. It seems unlikely that they have been updating all of root's packages except for the guix package. Rather, I bet they never updated root's packages at all, for ~1 year. I think this is a serious documentation bug. [0] https://bugs.gnu.org/25775 --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlivUBwACgkQJkb6MLrK fwi/yhAAlelolOt1nHcux0mRJzTUOtnRy6/sxvk1CjUXlkJcZk7HZ41urXrVdHPw sz8ZEbVvUCMBnD13N/mKVCqrc4LWxSJDd7aFqoNDcmiAb2gFNIE59R5shlRhD+JB sJq+EV2uV0MF1mFpOLMoWwjnPhijOn3tU+pR+4+P4pmsW99QKuLqYt9moNkemmoI r/ffnD5gzlB5wayDpJbod/lz8d7Apv+uKdS/54dZL1uokAsznnSUgBG59Bkq5LDm qCAsorCqOZDEl3JwEMnpjncXybVh7MaGT3njcsdZly7tBwNxEAMYyy1Dn4kGvHrX xspZCS92fwstYr3wxHm6uK+Ra2nG38cuDLDfvrx8mnoVLPAmHKfP9a/35SNyZFPY ejn5g+H/5nbqBbYrPrnSOdTm4On9Wif2TmJL5ZfOMuD2GAn7z+SsafyYse0rlPWC zxVaBA5G9CqUR2qpVj/jwq0DM5l5Nsthcq8J/XCO6iHh2pIiNTpOroT7J+MD4eL1 gaj367MdGx++llkgwgGKsR32PWKsg9bIrcTNMWohc/nvJN9VRQ2Oj5UjFvqq3GVV RXRbrWe8nn/X1gAydWnhQszfEI9a6pXBzd9l3BG2TawabPnoFR84X+aVsBo26hMT 1ZXSvWHqZwEa2UE/DlV5FtTd8WDMUl6gG+Wga8eLjsRyHpykLv4= =GAAa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e--