From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#25177: python-tests: python-oslosphinx fixed. Please evaluate. Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 23:16:45 -0500 Message-ID: <20170221041645.GC19762__41626.4512729414$1487650638$gmane$org@jasmine> References: <20170218181854.49ea3b17@scratchpost.org> <87bmtxkcqi.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="J/dobhs11T7y2rNN" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60742) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cg1su-0003G1-6h for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 23:17:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cg1ss-0005So-Rv for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 23:17:04 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:49872) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cg1ss-0005Sk-OE for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 23:17:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cg1ss-00032U-Gl for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 23:17:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87bmtxkcqi.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Marius Bakke Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, 25177@debbugs.gnu.org --J/dobhs11T7y2rNN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 12:00:21AM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > Danny Milosavljevic writes: > > @Leo: Can you please start a new evaluation of python-tests? >=20 > I pushed some other fixes recently and built most of `guix package -A > python`, so I think we're ready for a new evaluation. I suggest we do a > new evaluation on 'master' after fixing the most critical packages so we > can include this in 'core-updates'. How does that sound? I just started a new evaluation of the branch. > These packages are known to fail still: >=20 > python-dendropy > python2-fastlmm > python2-bandit > python-openid > python-axolotl >=20 > + Many of the python2 variants of the openstack family libraries (oslo > etc), which seems to have a unittest2 version mismatch. Should be > easy to fix, but let's get some substitutes first :-) I think we should set '#:tests? #f' in these packages and build and merge the branch. If these remaining test suite failures indicate that the packages are broken, they will be equally broken with the test suites disabled. But overall we will benefit from fixing this bug in python-build-system. --J/dobhs11T7y2rNN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlirvycACgkQJkb6MLrK fwgM8hAAkhYGZxyBp9Tm6OykoO+hcdCiS83tg1otDlU7SiLorpvsucuOQPyKxxsa oO413FFB5Rk6wqWvupilFYFmy91avTsdDiMgHbQf1yg8fIL7uNCJWui0WGOnx19v YdB8o9q1XEfpJoc5ihCUaiaERq6vvaeMbmXDLi8DA9qwjoHIfHKPOYwfoZy5a7cz FNK5+tVDxN1SOksKTwc3xjMtuLsI4i4+fs8uNNwXwRorknVsRE1982lfaBUKMQBx JYjyxhWZN6P+7Ib9EH/zkWa+79truelAtlq8v31zeYxwnIldAvTeO1gwwjskMoae gZ2EzS0j6WRD+9uvL7vmdb7aD2OUlTvu2z5Q+6i/3LBKiXHo0wQ07+0MJMnB1VXL 212GJeDkZVxEsGGg09Bsz8uLIvTTIrloI8eU7449qKLx6m78DtfiQsORVj4U/M8H d7N5xKuIDJ5iHgPgncV1ByzcQLdLLlHyDOccWri2s75vLZbU5qHiMPMK6IIbNKMa YbI6KxTg24gGwsbghH7POImnWq1ZzNKxPXYeae1V62ziYR5XCV5DH9rYDPsVAG1J C2+8pOgbIoNphU5p9kzpQGsFHtJqmzav1KIZSH7mWtYAZETOXe9IiTWDOvXO8B0Y 1G+5VVNplo/wK3kmzs7r+UhwZCG/1t/ij4LzME2jlb+lVVkyuD4= =X+0G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --J/dobhs11T7y2rNN--