From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ivan Vilata i Balaguer Subject: bug#25774: libmicrohttpd: fails to build (test-driver aborted) Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 02:18:58 +0100 Message-ID: <20170218011858.GC5900@sax.terramar.selidor.net> References: <20170217154858.GD7067@sax.terramar.selidor.net> <20170217162346.4pfljt2q2vv27b6l@wasp> <20170217162934.nuetcswipdil7xje@wasp> <20170217171030.GE7067@sax.terramar.selidor.net> <20170217205341.GB26051@jasmine> <20170217235949.GA5900@sax.terramar.selidor.net> <20170218004215.GA21331@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34806) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cetgz-0002oq-MV for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 20:20:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cetgw-0000wx-Ia for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 20:20:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45765) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cetgw-0000wn-Ex for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 20:20:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cetgw-0004Df-6d for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 20:20:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170218004215.GA21331@jasmine> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Leo Famulari Cc: 25774@debbugs.gnu.org, Ivan Vilata i Balaguer Leo Famulari (2017-02-17 19:42:15 -0500) wrote: > On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 12:59:49AM +0100, Ivan Vilata i Balaguer wrote: > > I can't find anything related there, I also searched the net before > > sending the report but found nothing that seemed the same error. > > What about this one? > > https://ng.gnunet.org/bugs/view.php?id=4844 > > The report says that it's limited to ppc64le, but the symptoms appear > identical. Looks like I'm too sleepy to check these things!`:D` I see from the ChangeLog that the version I'm building is from last October, before the fix mentioned in the link, so that may be already fixed upstream. Thanks for checking! -- Ivan Vilata i Balaguer -- https://elvil.net/