From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Danny Milosavljevic Subject: bug#25414: gdk-pixbuf@2.34.0 does not build deterministically Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 10:21:21 +0100 Message-ID: <20170114102117.71ec814d@scratchpost.org> References: <87eg0ay0ot.fsf@gnu.org> <20170111003315.357249c5@scratchpost.org> <87pojtwb57.fsf@gnu.org> <20170111231332.4812530e@scratchpost.org> <87fuko5sj0.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52377) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSKXG-0006w9-6v for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 04:22:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSKXC-0007J2-VQ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 04:22:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37952) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSKXC-0007Iy-SG for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 04:22:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cSKXC-00047T-1O for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 04:22:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87fuko5sj0.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 25414@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Ludo, On Thu, 12 Jan 2017 14:14:59 +0100 ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote: > guix build gdk-pixbuf --rounds=3D2 -K I added the patch and now I get: $ ./pre-inst-env guix build gdk-pixbuf --rounds=3D2 -K /gnu/store/m06fjrx641hbs786m5ysr3j41siqh8bn-gdk-pixbuf-2.36.3 > > guix/scripts/substitute.scm:659:16: In procedure fetch-narinfos: > > guix/scripts/substitute.scm:659:16: In procedure struct_vtable: Wrong t= ype argument in position 1 (expecting struct): #f =20 >=20 > Hmm hmm! Is it reproducible (it works for me)? If so, could you try to > see where the problem comes from by adding =E2=80=98pk=E2=80=99 calls lik= e this: I'll try again with latest master (building...). If it still happens I'll t= ry "pk". Thanks!