From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dian_cecht@zoho.com Subject: bug#25278: Acknowledgement (Possible virus found in icecat-45.5.1) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2016 16:20:47 -0800 Message-ID: <20161227002047.GA19923@khaalida> References: <20161226191835.GA15226@khaalida> <20161226201112.GA17281@khaalida> <20161226235750.GA23698@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42440) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cLfVq-0004QM-KF for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Dec 2016 19:21:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cLfVm-0001Ad-Li for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Dec 2016 19:21:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40756) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cLfVm-0001AX-IV for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Dec 2016 19:21:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cLfVm-0004KN-9b for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Dec 2016 19:21:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161226235750.GA23698@jasmine> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Leo Famulari Cc: 25278@debbugs.gnu.org On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 06:57:50PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 12:11:13PM -0800, dian_cecht@zoho.com wrote: > > I just wanted to add that I went ahead and ran icecat-45.5.1 then rescanned > > ~/.mozilla and nothing related to the virus popped up with the scan. > > Are the files with the same SHA1 hashes still present? So I rechecked the files listed in this bugreport and yes, the checksums are the same. However, they no longer list as viruses according to ClamAV. I checked my logs and I'm assuming that a database update fixed a false positive (freshclam updates the database every 2 hours on my machine, and, afaik, the virus definition was added in the last day or two). So it looks to me like it was simply a false positive.