From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#25177: Test failures don't cause some Python packages to fail Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 11:26:37 -0500 Message-ID: <20161224162637.GB6659@jasmine> References: <87y3ze1mnh.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20161217175621.GA31714@jasmine> <20161217201539.GA18911@jasmine> <87pokqnmmo.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20161218012835.GA23896@jasmine> <87eg15nk1x.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20161218190410.GA16498@jasmine> <8760mebfl4.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20161220193014.GA5450@jasmine> <87vau9o31x.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="i0/AhcQY5QxfSsSZ" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58060) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cKpA1-0002u1-3E for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 11:27:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cKp9x-0000iG-W3 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 11:27:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38541) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cKp9x-0000iA-Sa for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 11:27:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cKp9x-0001VK-LB for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 11:27:01 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87vau9o31x.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Marius Bakke Cc: Hartmut Goebel , 25177@debbugs.gnu.org --i0/AhcQY5QxfSsSZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 02:43:38PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > Leo Famulari writes: >=20 > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 07:49:59PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > >> Leo Famulari writes: > >> > Bah, I started a new one. > >>=20 > >> Did this one get cancelled? Perhaps we should merge this to 'staging' > >> and deal with any remaining failures when that is ready to be evaluate= d. > > > > Yes, it looks like that, although I don't know the exact reason. Hydra > > has lots of resource management and stability problems. > > > > I guess the python-tests jobset was canceled to free some resources for > > the release-0.12.0 jobset. > > > > I'd like to restart python-tests after 0.12.0 is released. >=20 > Should we try to evaluate this branch before staging? Yes, I just started a new evaluation. --i0/AhcQY5QxfSsSZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlheob0ACgkQJkb6MLrK fwipDhAAs+p+w9wGiqiRzCuaJj7ayBrEjIxVFJ4ijZ4bpIG1sWbx/7cdjSacGp/D M3G6QSpJz0m3UgS2QtbcJarahPDqul79yg/cOKCIV0bgQBZC7WzcS6CxtCwdyv2z jn4fgW1k0+mvnQxyuGqZXYm1WPD3QDcyzTu0Rtnf1P2BSEzeRC/YZxxor+hmoS4E UDKLVtx1Z3BVaLTtxE8IsyNTJVkl1lepumvddm8uQHFi915hZ4BX8Som0ImcaNTB 5sbjIAm15LBJ9hf1BOo2ATGDu4jXj18eDamlhbUFqhqSG5PnL7DGOjKHua/X3wwG ltaqshyk/4tdozX8Xpp03ZXzd/xTlSgt9iC9ij/ukZDpHpKei6w/k6JPo1Y6DRU9 zD+R3PoqvfkP0yai5odKxCdSeqtLtG3tiykALXCzPjttxliowiyouo6wGeyBL0kI 5uOeo3wDDBbgC7hmHrYm2VOJg9qcGAlwaebxvQa6Jgwv9slxq9hfhi1dI8UpCdIX pLbNo6/b5NGmIRVOWwowtliztG86F8GRj1l4Cfpk5VALwVMK4BJz4LtIqXI44FBQ inqvtMRIMfIB378M3hNYHrTyrHpjFs/dlG4DgpbIFFkjfB7ZZQkpaapMqI/KqOSU 6IuHJD+3BS3GngG4F/jiYw1aGxsmnI4+MOayGlomK3LglnlA63M= =99Ik -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --i0/AhcQY5QxfSsSZ--