From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#25177: Test failures don't cause some Python packages to fail Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:55:15 -0500 Message-ID: <20161215235515.GB14722@jasmine> References: <20161211181237.24485-6-ng0@libertad.pw> <20161211223454.GA9474@jasmine> <871sxem5ix.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87mvg1k2f3.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20161212154412.GA25907@jasmine> <87k2b4jhpw.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <8760mnk2av.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20161213221118.GA21407@jasmine> <87d1gtsfu2.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42631) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cHfsb-0001B4-87 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:56:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cHfsY-0003Rv-86 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:56:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:56196) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cHfsY-0003RY-3o for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:56:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cHfsX-0002bd-Qh for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:56:01 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87d1gtsfu2.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Marius Bakke Cc: Hartmut Goebel , 25177@debbugs.gnu.org --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:26:45AM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > All failures from this run should be fixed, and then some. Can you > restart it? Done, thanks for working on this! --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlhTLWMACgkQJkb6MLrK fwiuuRAAzZvLPHrvOZgEllvnrUIcYDUsicvDKQt70jedx10riCWkQTE2ExMo40rq ESOF8RxG/ztVIoULHvl15QHKrIC/lb8JMHwSpUC1LSuWAwTQmmipqm5iK2ZxR3bx 3713XPhVlbMy8iRQ8gwfliFD7oH0l5Hfw9yWhkKmqjEALo+k0FsSvi+3+Puo8/n2 awanWLC4oNDefmq2YwN4czd1BhIJPb2BTgotQjPivS+dLDPgJKQmcg785i010yAU 6wb2Cd1BQ2Ml2dzWdODKw4RPWjhgSgKBPSFHJV6L/juTJDkQ6gwkF+BmHL3zoc/E jA3P/CRgcaU+8Yk7hWEwjRe+fpdNvsFa/n6YwQsW8mrWHJJeHHV0SP9yDgnHFNLe oMKCa//mQLR7pjiOpW0Uc7ltt0PrTYarXOvKB6zXVJPcZWrjHlXdZr0o/lfe0le1 T7+1DuvBZdX5GfhGIJmU9oAMIJ1+Pg575B9hsMFuuTnHYkXcQD90wDF4znZudncC ctpL4z6TES4SCBV1dFrA/4iQ+w1eUonfs0+HNK04g/YcDOUElAco0n4BxgvjpXhM BRF01h3xWqc6SwHwnHUdH5rlvBHjLR54d54F7tUTG+lecQZBIjWfSDCyqNJlIEvR hHQwLWFESZvPpL7wwrFJsa4NM66HpaXQSLAtnY8QxXpCsGx3Rig= =o+gd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO--