From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#25177: Test failures don't cause some Python packages to fail [was Re: [PATCH 05/11] gnu: Add python-pygit2.] Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 18:23:00 -0500 Message-ID: <20161211232300.GB24179@jasmine> References: <20161211181237.24485-1-ng0@libertad.pw> <20161211181237.24485-6-ng0@libertad.pw> <20161211223454.GA9474@jasmine> <871sxem5ix.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87y3zmkqwa.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56531) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cGDTQ-0002ya-QK for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 18:24:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cGDTO-0002Nn-78 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 18:24:04 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51369) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cGDTO-0002Nc-3r for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 18:24:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cGDTN-00043e-VC for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2016 18:24:01 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87y3zmkqwa.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Marius Bakke Cc: 25177@debbugs.gnu.org --nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 12:05:57AM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > Marius Bakke writes: >=20 > > Perhaps something like this would work (untested)? >=20 > Oops, here is the patch I wanted to attach: Can you make it a patch? :) --nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlhN39MACgkQJkb6MLrK fwhzRg/+OGMILFivCkD/WdyR6yQlMpMqfvCaDXmfa55NaftetQbQ12B98mqRQhrp w4LEYXTMhlVeQSkDrM1fOGMy3wsHzbXmhbarqpuA3OgLEmHkNMXX15s/fdhEY/K2 xQ52USplt9jrc5fA1sFiVz/QZQBIGasENmKhX3KG5KEQTR3gcAzqerL2kVRMfRcw Hh2aYTfRJ05m2rKZcoL4BMjcZhMZkGViUGxvEdp7UcTt/FWY8Ei+GCT6FgbTR3xA lNUZbQmsUlk84NZWbNrTqFhmt2GReLYLHS6rAHesVNqEqKjwo73b7ynDcPwpiFqb fYTiVF/Mq2fbXc8rGyldbEvWc7zK4nPDLT69j/jLL/G5Bo8gits1vx/7hMKPIPBE Kj3hu7OVzHfqi3N0MNqsmMxlPQ9T8IY/LHe8usfEcdbHPFCZ4ZOrqbB9jxX+EWib ftTYjkBCXxl5Ok1OMh9MLoE/Ow8rWOr9g/OAjf6tp7FsLa9GnBM9f+iGmpmwLk53 hl3xp7o4bbppKTQMasa/PvNKc2AP82Q4leHdkSwWaxw1OC3BVlxTlJ46/Eh+/i2y 72zC9sH1DSo3OlqfT8Bg4O8wThS9UoFZYCJXQw3+M77mM9nCRHhzretK5MU3JbEX Fhw2ZIzHm+Sis8BlbOLOVY0+QspSP4Z4thEMKTkvNXzSbIWPWJ4= =wVlV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j--