From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Patterson Subject: bug#25101: simple-scan can't use hpaio Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2016 23:00:35 -0500 Message-ID: <20161204040037.21758-1-ajpatter@uwaterloo.ca> References: <20161203194113.6456663e@scratchpost.org> Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53797) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cDO05-0003wL-Fo for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2016 23:02:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cDO02-0005O8-Bv for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2016 23:02:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36379) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cDO02-0005O4-9C for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2016 23:02:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cDO02-0007iT-0N for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2016 23:02:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20161203194113.6456663e@scratchpost.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: 25101@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Danny, I also noticed this problem a couple days ago, and I really needed to scan something, so I've had these patches in my tree. It basically implements your second suggestion. I think it's the right way to go about it. I realise you might also have patches you're working on, but maybe this is helpful anyway. Suggestions welcome, especially concerning how I handled the recursive module dependencies. Thanks, -- Andy