From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#24026: librecad and dealii depend on relocated muparser source code repo Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 18:26:16 -0400 Message-ID: <20160721222616.GA9741@jasmine> References: <87poq9a8a6.fsf@netris.org> <20160720062614.GA17614@jasmine> <871t2oo9ea.fsf@netris.org> <20160720163945.GA26001@jasmine> <20160720235200.2359d8dc@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45833) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQMQt-00063f-4e for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 18:27:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQMQp-0004Y8-UE for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 18:27:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48326) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQMQo-0004Xm-8P for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 18:27:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bQMQo-000362-3Z for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 18:27:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160720235200.2359d8dc@openmailbox.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Eric Bavier Cc: 24026-done@debbugs.gnu.org On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 11:52:00PM -0500, Eric Bavier wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 12:39:45 -0400 > Leo Famulari wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 07:07:25AM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote: > > > Hmm. It would be good to see the diff between the two "versions" of > > > 2.2.5. If there's anything substantive in there, then we might want to > > > bump the version on our behalf. Otherwise it probably doesn't matter. > > > > The difference seem trivial to me. There are fixed typos in comments, > > and code changes in 'example1.cpp'. I assume that 'example1.cpp' is > > unimportant, but I don't know. > > > > What do you think about the attached patch? > > LGTM. Thanks for the review! Pushed as d7cff656d.