From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#23971: Nobody has a shell Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 16:10:24 -0400 Message-ID: <20160714201024.GA32471@jasmine> References: <874m7tjiyj.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46042) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bNmyT-0001FV-66 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 16:11:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bNmyN-00087W-Cn for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 16:11:08 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:39460) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bNmyM-00087J-6m for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 16:11:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bNmyM-0005Ou-0e for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 16:11:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Vincent Legoll Cc: 23971-done@debbugs.gnu.org On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 12:25:57PM +0200, Vincent Legoll wrote: > > Indeed, fixed in 2d94702ff4133606cda1e51a2c8378a8e79afb9d. > > > > The ‘shell’ field was omitted from the definition of “nobody”, which is > > why it ended up using Bash, which is the default shell. > > Thanks the fix looks good, but I tried with guix system reconfigure > after guix pull > That does not change /etc/passwd I've noticed that certain changes to my own user require reboot. Others, which involve bringing previously non-Guix controlled user parameters under control of Guix, seemed to require me to remove the user from my system configuration, reconfigure, and then re-add the user. I'm not sure what nobody's GuixSD user configuration would look like. Neither is a good solution, but could you try them out?