From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#23776: Perl's .pod files include timestamps, making Perl package builds non-deterministic Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 14:23:05 -0400 Message-ID: <20160625182305.GA24122@jasmine> References: <87fusdgyg5.fsf@gnu.org> <20160616153927.GB2245@jasmine> <20160619173154.GA26953@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51480) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bGsFV-00062k-Kg for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2016 14:24:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bGsFP-0000hT-KP for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2016 14:24:08 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43361) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bGsFO-0000gT-EF for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2016 14:24:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bGsFO-0002mV-3T for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Jun 2016 14:24:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160619173154.GA26953@jasmine> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 23776@debbugs.gnu.org On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 01:31:54PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > I noticed that Pod::Man is supposed to respect SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH, as of > the upstream module version 4.03 (released 2015-12-06). Does anyone know > how to check the version of the module bundled into perl? In Perl 5.24.0, the integrated podlators module was upgraded from 2.28 from 4.0.7 [0]. AIUI, changing perl-build-system will require rebuilding all Perl packages. If so, how about updating Perl to 5.24.0 instead of changing the build system? Do Perl updates tend to break a lot of Perl packages? If so, changing the build system and rebuilding might be done sooner than a Perl update, since this change seems unlikely to break any packages. Your advice requested :) [0] https://metacpan.org/pod/distribution/perl/pod/perldelta.pod#Updated-Modules-and-Pragmata