From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Danny Milosavljevic Subject: bug#23286: Unable to unlock xscreensaver in Xfce Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 06:37:49 +0200 Message-ID: <20160521063749.4bfd1a4d@scratchpost.org> References: <570EB72F.9060101@fripost.org> <87lh4gm8x3.fsf@gnu.org> <20160423095509.46afe0e7@scratchpost.org> <571BB528.7090801@fripost.org> <20160423202252.4802df28@scratchpost.org> <20160423202816.1412a0cc@scratchpost.org> <571BD7DB.7060606@fripost.org> <20160424031423.22ef23ad@scratchpost.org> <571CD23A.1070208@fripost.org> <20160426231752.5355f72b@scratchpost.org> <572CE293.5080400@fripost.org> <20160518204439.31571a4c@scratchpost.org> <573F461A.9010904@fripost.org> <20160520194849.4bae25b7@scratchpost.org> <20160520222201.7b52e715@fripost.org> <20160520202848.460abd5d@scratchpost.org> <20160520204209.75bbfb60@scratchpost.org> <20160521003629.0796482e@fripost.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39701) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b3yfu-0008Sa-Aw for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 21 May 2016 00:38:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b3yfq-00066H-8O for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 21 May 2016 00:38:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47113) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b3yfq-00066D-5I for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 21 May 2016 00:38:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b3yfp-0004yI-Up for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 21 May 2016 00:38:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20160521003629.0796482e@fripost.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Albin Cc: 23286@debbugs.gnu.org On Sat, 21 May 2016 00:36:29 +0200 Albin wrote: Ok, then let's try to find out which locker xflock4 actually uses (from the file you attached). To recap, when you call $ xflock4 manually it locks but doesn't allow you to unlock, right? Please try to call these manually (in that order) and stop at the first one that doesn't throw an error: $ xscreensaver-command -lock $ gnome-screensaver-command --lock $ xlock -mode blank $ slock Which one was it? (It will probably still be unable to unlock)