From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Darrington Subject: bug#23217: xboing bugs Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 16:14:03 -0400 Message-ID: <20160427201403.GB30439@gnu.org> References: <20160404184735.GC3934@protected.rcdrun.com> <871t6ftcax.fsf@gmail.com> <20160416064753.GA25965@gnu.org> <87r3e33rig.fsf@gnu.org> <20160418201404.GA17099@gnu.org> <87twix7v17.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56922) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avVrW-0005WR-Bc for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 16:15:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avVrS-0005Rg-I2 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 16:15:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38335) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avVrS-0005Rb-EL for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 16:15:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1avVrS-0001wF-BD for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 16:15:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87twix7v17.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic Court??s Cc: Alex Kost , 23217@debbugs.gnu.org, Jean Louis On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:27:48PM +0200, Ludovic Court??s wrote: > John Darrington skribis: > > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 04:45:11PM +0200, Ludovic Court??s wrote: > >> John Darrington skribis: > >> > >> > You have to run it with the -usedefcmap option. Then it works > >> > just fine. > >> > >> Can we improve on this or should we close the bug? > >> > > > > I see that debian has some quite extensive patches to Xboing, > > which seems to fix this issue and many others. > > > > Should we purloin them? > > I would suggest taking only those that fix serious bugs such as this > one. WDYT? It depends on what you consider as serious. Some of them fix potential buffer overflows. Debian considers that a serious bug. > > Ludo???.