From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#22831: OpenSSL should not depend on Perl Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 03:47:38 -0500 Message-ID: <20160229084738.GB18766@jasmine> References: <87lh66xew6.fsf@gnu.org> <20160228011027.GC6690@jasmine> <87povhvtyn.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40120) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aaJUr-0007UN-S4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 03:48:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aaJUo-0006cp-J3 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 03:48:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54712) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aaJUo-0006cP-Fz for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 03:48:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aaJUo-0006IC-9K for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 03:48:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87povhvtyn.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 22831@debbugs.gnu.org On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 02:35:12PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Leo Famulari skribis: > > > On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 06:05:29PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > >> Commit 784d6e91 changed OpenSSL such that it does not depend on Perl, > >> but one of the subsequent upgrades broke it: > > > > Bisecting, I narrowed it down to: > > 86c8f1daf8ed10f13f2b1e973a28845629b8ce47 > > (gnu: openssl: Update to 1.0.2e [fixes CVE-2015-{3193,3194,3195}].). > > > > I'll get the openssl sources corresponding to the good and bad commmits > > and try to figure out what changed that pulled perl back in. > > Awesome. Hopefully we can apply the fix when we upgrade OpenSSL this > Tuesday. 'openssl-c-rehash.patch' is being applied, but at some point in the build process the change is reverted. I haven't figured out why yet. Ludo is right, it would be really good to only change our OpenSSL package one day this week. So, I'm asking for help with this problem! I will spend some time on it tomorrow, but I really don't have any promising leads. My plan is to step through the build process and learn when the shebang is recreated. Hopefully then I will get some inspiration. I suppose a nasty short term fix would be to patch the file after installing it. I will submit that patch if it seems there is no other option in time for the security update.