From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#22558: gnupg-2.1.11 on x86_64 failed its tests many times on Hydra Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 02:46:07 -0500 Message-ID: <20160213074607.GA19493@jasmine> References: <87r3gs9zvf.fsf@gnu.org> <20160204193649.GA8785@debian> <87d1scxkd6.fsf@netris.org> <878u2ws0se.fsf@gnu.org> <87bn7ltsxl.fsf@netris.org> <20160213001240.GA10583@jasmine> <877fi9tl0c.fsf@netris.org> <20160212220232.2b89e386@openmailbox.org> <20160213074118.GA24222@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49484) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUUv3-0002Pg-37 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 02:47:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUUuz-000088-Rh for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 02:47:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57534) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUUuz-000084-OF for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 02:47:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aUUuz-0008Ed-Je for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 02:47:01 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160213074118.GA24222@jasmine> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric Bavier Cc: 22558-done@debbugs.gnu.org On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 02:41:18AM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 10:02:32PM -0600, Eric Bavier wrote: > > On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 21:13:55 -0500 > > Mark H Weaver wrote: > > > > > Leo Famulari writes: > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 06:22:46PM -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote: > > > >> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > > > >> > > > >> > Eric Bavier skribis: > > > >> > > > > >> >>> > * With 14 test failures. This happened at least twice, on > > > >> >>> > hydra.gnunet.org. > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> Eric Bavier reported on #guix that it failed to build on his machine > > > >> >>> twice in a row, with 14 test failures. > > > >> >> > > > >> >> I used 'git bisect' on the gnupg repository to narrow the failures > > > >> >> down. Commit ee87c653bf is the commit that introduces the failures. > > > >> > > > > >> > Thanks for digging! Could you report it upstream? > > > >> > > > >> I reported it upstream, and now they have a fix in their repo. > > > >> I've attached a patch to Guix which adds this upstream patch. > > > >> > > > >> Eric, would you be willing to test it and see if it fixes the problem > > > >> for you? > > > > > > > > I'm not Eric, but with this patch, I can successfully build on the > > > > machine that was previously exhibiting the failures. > > > > > > Thanks! I went ahead and pushed this to master, commit 3a7261bf96. > > > I'm closing this bug now. > > > > I realize I'm a bit late, but I just wanted to let you know that this > > appears to fix the gnupg-2.1.11 build for me too: > > > > @ build-succeeded /gnu/store/qyjrqxnrka55p5g5vh1p80ac1rxn5nfm-gnupg-2.1.11.drv - > > /gnu/store/w6fbikpwzpjkwvy6z1hwbszq0x83yspv-gnupg-2.1.11 > > > > But I had to add "#:use-module (gnu packages)" to the > > gnu/packages/gnupg.scm before it would build, otherwise "could not > > find symbol search-path". > > Weird, that did not happen to me when building from 3a7261bf96b2 on > x86_64 with a recent guix-daemon. I do have a different output hash: /gnu/store/bky2i5n7wvcnbzpxpnb4y5r5p795sc7v-gnupg-2.1.11