From: Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org>
To: Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu>
Cc: 22354@debbugs.gnu.org, bug-bash@gnu.org
Subject: bug#22354: Hash-bang line length
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 11:39:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160113163917.GB27325__14000.4691355445$1452703283$gmane$org@eeg.ccf.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56967A06.8040104@case.edu>
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:23:34AM -0500, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 1/13/16 9:04 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 02:52:08PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> >> Sure, but the fact that it???s smaller than that of the kernel Linux is
> >> problematic: when a hash-bang line > 127 chars is encountered, ???execve???
> >> fails with ENOENT, so Bash???s fallback code is executed, fails as well,
> >> but it prints a misleading error message with an even more truncated
> >> hash-bang line.
> >
> > Let's suppose bash is changed to read a shebang line of unlimited length.
> > In your scenario, the script with the 150 character shebang fails at the
> > kernel level with ENOENT, so bash's fallback code runs, and the script
> > is executed by a new instance of bash.
>
> No, it isn't. The execve fails with ENOENT, so bash just prints an error
> message containing the interpreter name, which Ludo is reporting is
> truncated.
Ah. You're right, and I should have double-checked Ludo's understanding
of the code before responding. I assumed Ludo's assertion was correct,
but it's not.
The "fallback code" is only executed when execve() fails with ENOEXEC.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-13 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <87lh7t7p4w.fsf@gnu.org>
2016-01-13 13:19 ` bug#22354: Hash-bang line length Greg Wooledge
[not found] ` <20160113131902.GU27325@eeg.ccf.org>
2016-01-13 13:52 ` Ludovic Courtès
[not found] ` <87y4bt60zb.fsf@gnu.org>
2016-01-13 14:04 ` Greg Wooledge
2016-01-13 16:21 ` Chet Ramey
[not found] ` <20160113140441.GZ27325@eeg.ccf.org>
2016-01-13 16:23 ` Chet Ramey
[not found] ` <56967A06.8040104@case.edu>
2016-01-13 16:39 ` Greg Wooledge [this message]
[not found] ` <56967976.2080908@case.edu>
2016-01-13 17:41 ` Ludovic Courtès
[not found] ` <87vb6x2x7u.fsf@gnu.org>
2016-01-13 20:47 ` Chet Ramey
2016-01-13 16:18 ` Chet Ramey
2016-01-12 9:14 bug#22354: Test failure when running distcheck from out-of-tree build Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer
2016-01-13 10:25 ` bug#22354: Hash-bang line length Ludovic Courtès
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='20160113163917.GB27325__14000.4691355445$1452703283$gmane$org@eeg.ccf.org' \
--to=wooledg@eeg.ccf.org \
--cc=22354@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=bug-bash@gnu.org \
--cc=chet.ramey@case.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).