From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#22232: libcue source tarball not bootstrapped Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 20:36:21 -0500 Message-ID: <20151229013621.GA15460@jasmine> References: <20151224173450.GA19828@jasmine> <20151227130946.GA14648@debian.fritz.box> <20151227144511.GA370@jasmine> <87lh8e9n3i.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39068) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aDjDl-0003F9-Mv for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2015 20:37:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aDjDi-0008EF-HZ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2015 20:37:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:39477) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aDjDi-0008EB-Dz for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2015 20:37:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aDjDi-0004Ap-AG for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2015 20:37:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87lh8e9n3i.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 22232@debbugs.gnu.org On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 12:20:49AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Leo Famulari skribis: > > > On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 02:09:46PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 12:34:50PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > >> > Can someone recommend a "template" email I can send to upstream > >> > developers requesting that they bootstrap their release tarballs? > >> > >> Here is what I sent recently to the numactl list: > >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.numa/951 > > > > Thank you! This is exactly the email I was looking for. I will adapt it > > as necessary. > > It might also be useful to point them at > . It looks like upstream is preparing a new release that switches from Autotools to CMake. I'll just wait for that. We can close this bug.