From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: bug#21620: tests/mpz/reuse intermittently fails on armhf-linux-gnu Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 21:07:54 +0200 Message-ID: <20151008190754.GA6984@debian> References: <87mvvxuxoo.fsf@gnu.org> <868u7gb1s5.fsf@shell.gmplib.org> <87d1wsm0jo.fsf@gnu.org> <87y4ffsa3y.fsf@netris.org> <87egh7b0p0.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3l6onje.fsf@netris.org> <87a8ru5sic.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55112) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZkGYs-0004ld-2O for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 15:09:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZkGYo-0003kS-O9 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 15:09:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44044) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZkGYo-0003kG-LH for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 15:09:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZkGYo-0000fL-2g for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 15:09:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87a8ru5sic.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 21620@debbugs.gnu.org, Andreas Enge On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 10:32:43PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Do you think it’s a likely problem? Andreas, could you try again on > your Novena with 2 cores turned off? I have trouble believing the explanation of overheating. The gmp test suite is carried out sequentially (they are not yet using the parallel test harness of the autotools). So one could only imagine that the build itself was faulty, but should then the test not fail consistently afterwards? If I understood correctly, you used one build and ran the same test over and over again. On the other hand, since the machine also serves as a build machine, it is possible that some other package was built at the same time as the tests were carried out, which may have contributed to heating. I suggest to wait until the current build frenzy has stopped with the merge of core-updates, and then to test by hand outside guix with only one or two cores. Andreas