From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: bug#20735: bug#20757: "unable to fork" on armhf Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 07:17:03 +0300 Message-ID: <20150913071703.7c509d32@debian-netbook> References: <20150607114147.5ad49048@debian-netbook> <87h9qji445.fsf@netris.org> <87616qjuvm.fsf@netris.org> <20150614165251.65d428e4@debian-netbook> <20150615145334.56872a85@debian-netbook> <87613gc17m.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/5VbM_wANlKShETmSpG/gR25"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60198) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zayjt-0000bv-Te for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 00:18:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zayjq-0006nk-Nk for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 00:18:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38161) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zayjq-0006ng-KO for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 00:18:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zayjp-00068C-Vn for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 00:18:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87613gc17m.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 20735@debbugs.gnu.org, 20757@debbugs.gnu.org --Sig_/5VbM_wANlKShETmSpG/gR25 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 19:31:09 +0200 ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote: > Efraim Flashner skribis: >=20 > > On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 16:52:51 +0300 > > Efraim Flashner wrote: > > > >> On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 09:13:17 -0400 > >> Mark H Weaver wrote: > >>=20 > >> > Any update on this? Did you try rebuilding your kernel with the nee= ded > >> > configuration options enabled? > >> >=20 > >> > Thanks, > >> > Mark > >>=20 > >> I haven't had a chance yet to rebuild my kernel yet, but I hope to > >> tonight > >>=20 > > > > I recompiled the kernel, still getting failed to fork. I'm missing > > something board specific about using the new kernel. I'll figure it out > > soonish. >=20 > Hi! Any update? Or should we close the bug until we have more clues? >=20 > Thanks, > Ludo=E2=80=99. Lets close it for now. I haven't had anytime to work on it still, and its n= ot a guix bug that an unrelated kernel didn't have the configuration set the w= ay we'd like. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --Sig_/5VbM_wANlKShETmSpG/gR25 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJV9Pi/AAoJEPTB05F+rO6THDEP/iqoexzhmqIPVbEJVPcpXrhl BvZJh+AkIdiUD/iGeNpSfRAuq3am5Za36/9O69IRNJPTZ7g1LSFsLerjCGFsyaPH li4zEYXxj8T0JaGQdQdCNNQTdp2X6xq4KgvjecLM29LDal+pO8ZvBqM/Z7yNHzRt WTCIRG9ABCm3hLMHwyHcCxws+HDtXmmoonZnO5CtDu7eoyDo6fDZECYr/WRDSW3W 0HvnEY5e2UF0FIrkuisVZjzskA4r01zYwajqbH01zy8R7UVHbo8igVNuHsMjzYcQ Zfgbfna0RyT80aO9+a8czZVpCX3x0SIe8hrxw94ME9i1bw2Ol08YIAP82inFlhjh zGnvm0sH7AnHhXQ/2SAj7od54zGwbpjIQv+UwgaQyQLU6NX6GdU+Va6VUNQ/AckJ fP5nEdwbV7g5bhtPjB4MOncymXaKt8aPg1M0wY5HEOWoVMyFYoFrB/CR8mS8Btdk y81lEnWg5/ZNXfgoKedfIfSVowa7IJiQxK5z170FaWL0eMRPsZs+1dk30gz/PXZ9 rGvwkHR8jXe51vDmqYuvCpO3oPz8RrMPYUVM35cHuWW6Ajnma0NR46Scz/duAXgh q5PY4jk0+CzCBwqpAjXl9G+cy45tQalsJmEppFYgvaV2buyAw0HVmVtuEU64YJgu Sc/ASwR3of7YQivdUrDW =9oDS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/5VbM_wANlKShETmSpG/gR25--