From: Alex Vong <alexvong1995@gmail.com>
To: 21410@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#21410: [TEST-FAIL] 2 tests failed when running `make check' on Debian
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 14:44:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150904144440.2f14182d@debian> (raw)
Hi everyone,
I tried to compile Guix on Debian Sid,
the compilation succeeded,
but the 2 of the tests in the Testsuit failed.
The following is what commands I have run,
all commands are run as non-root:
$ git clone git://git.savannah.gnu.org/guix.git
$ cd guix
$ ./bootstrap
$ ./configure
$ make -j4
$ make -j4 check
The Testsuite summary (test-suite.log) is inlined below:
======================================
GNU Guix 0.8.3: ./test-suite.log
======================================
# TOTAL: 47
# PASS: 45
# SKIP: 0
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL: 2
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0
.. contents:: :depth: 2
FAIL: tests/syscalls
====================
;;; note: source file ./srfi/srfi-64.scm
;;; newer than compiled /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/guile/2.0/ccache/srfi/srfi-64.go
ERROR: In procedure primitive-load:
ERROR: In procedure scm_i_lreadparen: tests/syscalls.scm:128:14: end of file
%%%% Starting test syscalls (Writing full log to "syscalls.log")
tests/syscalls.scm:85: FAIL clone
tests/syscalls.scm:98: FAIL setns
;;; note: source file ./srfi/srfi-64.scm
;;; newer than compiled /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/guile/2.0/ccache/srfi/srfi-64.go
%%%% Starting test syscalls (Writing full log to "syscalls.log")
tests/syscalls.scm:85: FAIL clone
tests/syscalls.scm:98: FAIL setns
tests/syscalls.scm:127: FAIL pivot-root
# of expected passes 15
# of unexpected failures 3
FAIL: tests/containers
======================
%%%% Starting test containers (Writing full log to "containers.log")
tests/containers.scm:37: FAIL call-with-container, user namespace
tests/containers.scm:45: FAIL call-with-container, uts namespace
tests/containers.scm:55: FAIL call-with-container, pid namespace
tests/containers.scm:70: FAIL call-with-container, mnt namespace
tests/containers.scm:77: FAIL call-with-container, all namespaces
tests/containers.scm:83: FAIL container-excursion
# of unexpected failures 6
;;; note: source file ./srfi/srfi-64.scm
;;; newer than compiled /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/guile/2.0/ccache/srfi/srfi-64.go
FAIL tests/containers.scm (exit status: 1)
next reply other threads:[~2015-09-04 7:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-04 6:44 Alex Vong [this message]
2015-09-04 14:12 ` bug#21410: [TEST-FAIL] 2 tests failed when running `make check' on Debian Thompson, David
2015-09-04 15:02 ` Alex Vong
2015-09-04 20:07 ` Ludovic Courtès
2015-09-05 12:49 ` Thompson, David
2015-09-05 17:43 ` Thompson, David
2015-09-07 1:47 ` Alex Vong
2015-09-07 19:42 ` Thompson, David
2015-09-09 10:02 ` Alex Vong
2015-09-15 11:24 ` Alex Vong
2015-09-15 14:20 ` Thompson, David
2015-09-15 15:06 ` Alex Vong
[not found] <20150906123025.64b32157@debian>
2015-09-06 11:25 ` Thompson, David
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150904144440.2f14182d@debian \
--to=alexvong1995@gmail.com \
--cc=21410@debbugs.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).