From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: pkg-config disappeared Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 15:36:11 +0200 Message-ID: <201306151536.12034.andreas@enge.fr> References: <201306142256.32319.andreas@enge.fr> <871u83bjwb.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48255) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UnqeT-0006EU-8L for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 09:36:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UnqeR-00066a-11 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 09:36:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <871u83bjwb.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?utf-8?q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org Am Samstag, 15. Juni 2013 schrieb Ludovic Court=C3=A8s: > I just committed this to solve the problem: =2D(define %pkg-config +;; This is the "primitive" pkg-config package. People should use `pkg- config' +;; (see below) rather than `%pkg-config', but we export `%pkg-config' so=20 that +;; `fold-packages' finds it. +(define-public %pkg-config This is weird; we should not expect people to install %pkg-config instead=20 of pkg-config. Something else should be modified so that pkg-config is=20 "visible" by "guix package" under its normal name. Andreas